SOCREF-L Archives – June 2008, week 3

1. "Touches" in the context of offside
   • "Touches" in the context of offside (46 lines)
     From: Conrad Thomaier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:06:49 -0600
   • Re: "Touches" in the context of offside (61 lines)
     From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:09:14 +0000
   • Re: "Touches" in the context of offside (68 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:06:52 -0700
   • Re: "Touches" in the context of offside (94 lines)
     From: Mark Goorsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:08:57 -0700
   • Re: "Touches" in the context of offside (65 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:02:21 -0400

2. "Touches" in the context of offside-cps
   • Re: "Touches" in the context of offside-cps (40 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:11:51 -0400
   • Re: "Touches" in the context of offside-cps (20 lines)
     From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:38:19 -0400

3. 'Beautiful game' takes on new meaning
   • 'Beautiful game' takes on new meaning (16 lines)
     From: Castiglione, Andrew P <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:22:40 +0000
   • 'Beautiful game' takes on new meaning (16 lines)
     From: Castiglione, Andrew P <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:40:59 +0000
   • Re: 'Beautiful game' takes on new meaning (15 lines)
     From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:42:49 -0400
   • Re: 'Beautiful game' takes on new meaning (35 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:24:21 -0400

4. Badges? Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!
   • Re: Badges? Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges! (48 lines)
     From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:35:04 -0400

5. Can you commit a foul or misconduct if you only get the ball?
   • Can you commit a foul or misconduct if you only get the ball? (43 lines)
     From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:19:32 -0400
   • Re: Can you commit a foul or misconduct if you only get the ball? (76 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:42:47 -0500
   • Re: Can you commit a foul or misconduct if you only get the ball? (32 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:57:13 -0400
   • Re: Can you commit a foul or misconduct if you only get the ball? (71 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:06:21 -0400
   • Re: Can you commit a foul or misconduct if you only get the ball? (70 lines)
     From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:27:45 -0400

6. choice of officials
   • choice of officials (20 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:14:38 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (34 lines)
     From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:36:16 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (38 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:42:05 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (24 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:48:53 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (46 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:38:13 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials (26 lines)
     From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:35:46 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (29 lines)
     From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:59:50 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (23 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:37:34 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (28 lines)
     From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:46:01 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (45 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:18:45 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials (45 lines)
     From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:29:31 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (42 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:38:04 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials (32 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:50:06 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (48 lines)
     From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:51:28 -0500
   • Re: choice of officials (58 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:59:19 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (29 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:07:30 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials (99 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:12:55 -0700
   • Re: choice of officials (55 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:21:56 -0400

7. choice of officials-Esse
   • Re: choice of officials-Esse (34 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:35:12 EDT
   • Re: choice of officials-Esse (46 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:40:16 -0500
   • Re: choice of officials-Esse (91 lines)
     From: Roy D. Inglis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:00:14 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials-Esse (32 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:00:48 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials-Esse (133 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:06:25 -0400
   • Re: choice of officials-Esse (87 lines)
     From: Roy D. Inglis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:47:33 -0400

8. choice of officials/behavior in the technical area
   • Re: choice of officials/behavior in the technical area (37 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:55:31 -0700

9. Euro 2008 and offside controversies
   • Euro 2008 and offside controversies (37 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:36:21 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (59 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:48:26 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (33 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:26:20 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (46 lines)
     From: Terry Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:05:51 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (41 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:29:53 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (62 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:45:27 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (49 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:19:44 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (88 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:32:39 -0700
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (51 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:44:30 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (37 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:59:41 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (58 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:40:04 -0500
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (55 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:48:12 -0500
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (102 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:17:20 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (27 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:34:41 -0400
   • Re: Euro 2008 and offside controversies (42 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:40:14 -0700

10. Euro 2008 Controversies
    • Euro 2008 Controversies (17 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:51:39 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2008 Controversies (20 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:42:45 -0400

11. Father's day thoughts
    • Father's day thoughts (30 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:39:12 -0400

12. history
    • history (16 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:33:16 -0500

13. Holland -- Russia -- Satellite reception out!! ;o(((
    • Holland -- Russia -- Satellite reception out!! ;o((( (24 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:40:50 -0400
    • Re: Holland -- Russia -- Satellite reception out!! ;o((( (37 lines)
      From: Coach JMag (Hotmail) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:48:46 -0400

14. Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon
    • Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (85 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:27:40 -0400
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (101 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:43:47 -0700
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (27 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:47:58 -0400
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (36 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:57:17 -0700
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (29 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:25:06 -0700
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (35 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:40:24 -0400
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (35 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:43:07 -0400
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (36 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:11:52 -0700
    • Re: Holland vs Russia -- Old Onion Breath gets it wrong again; the referee team gets it right; the "buzzer" flags save referee's (and player's) bacon (51 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:16:21 -0400

15. It makes it FUN
    • It makes it FUN (39 lines)
      From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:20:58 -0400

16. Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED)
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (54 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:04:56 -0400
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (65 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:38:30 -0400
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (78 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:05:46 -0400
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (66 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:20:25 -0400
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (87 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:49:11 -0400
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (44 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:20:04 -0500
    • Re: Italy Romania offside controversy again (SCORE RESULT MENTIONED) (65 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:16:34 -0700

17. need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver
    • need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver (41 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:24:59 -0400
    • need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver (51 lines)
      From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:30:28 -0400
    • Re: need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver (54 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:17:35 -0700
    • Re: need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver (78 lines)
      From: Les Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:13:40 -0400
    • Re: need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver (40 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:44:39 -0400
    • Re: need to borrow some pinnies in Vancouver (31 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:47:56 -0400

18. officials/behavior in the technical area
    • officials/behavior in the technical area (32 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:29:10 EDT

19. PIADM (was Unbelievable Turkey/Czech)
    • PIADM (was Unbelievable Turkey/Czech) (88 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:55:39 -0400
    • Re: PIADM (was Unbelievable Turkey/Czech) (35 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:30:50 -0400
    • Re: PIADM (was Unbelievable Turkey/Czech) (23 lines)
      From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:20:49 -0700
    • Re: PIADM (was Unbelievable Turkey/Czech) (31 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:04:11 -0700
    • Re: PIADM (was Unbelievable Turkey/Czech) (28 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:13:48 -0400

20. Police Arrest Soccer Player After Referee Bitten On Face
    • Police Arrest Soccer Player After Referee Bitten On Face (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:27:25 EDT
    • Re: Police Arrest Soccer Player After Referee Bitten On Face (21 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:09:05 -0400
    • Re: Police Arrest Soccer Player After Referee Bitten On Face (97 lines)
      From: Jamie Gorger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:01:12 EDT

21. Stopping play, losing time, and the SOTG
    • Stopping play, losing time, and the SOTG (65 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:34:31 -0400
    • Re: Stopping play, losing time, and the SOTG (76 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:57:28 -0700
    • Re: Stopping play, losing time, and the SOTG (74 lines)
      From: Jack Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:10:22 -0700
    • Re: Stopping play, losing time, and the SOTG (108 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:56:19 -0700
    • Re: Stopping play, losing time, and the SOTG (54 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:01:15 -0700

22. teams play the ball out
    • teams play the ball out (28 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:31:59 EDT

23. Unbelievable Turkey/Czech
    • Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (15 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:53:08 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (25 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:43:23 -0700
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (37 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:42:37 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (56 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:32:29 -0700
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (62 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:40:26 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (73 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:17:54 -0700
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (29 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:30:25 -0500
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (45 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:29:56 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (52 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:01:28 -0500
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (63 lines)
      From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:23:10 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (43 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:53:56 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (71 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:51:43 -0500
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (89 lines)
      From: Jim Richardson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:34:54 -0400
    • Re: Unbelievable Turkey/Czech (94 lines)
      From: Terry Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:21:48 -0400

24. Undercutting vs. jumping at
    • Undercutting vs. jumping at (33 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:09:32 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (47 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:42:26 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (77 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:19:09 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (112 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:25:31 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (52 lines)
      From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:58:56 -0700
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (64 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:07:27 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (103 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:19:21 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (69 lines)
      From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:23:01 -0700
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (126 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:26:50 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (100 lines)
      From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:30:07 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (50 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:41:46 -0400
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (104 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:01:55 -0500
    • Re: Undercutting vs. jumping at (40 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:33:51 -0600

25. Why I hate it when teams play the ball out rather than letting the referee decide to stop the game
    • Why I hate it when teams play the ball out rather than letting the referee decide to stop the game (37 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:20:27 -0400
    • Re: Why I hate it when teams play the ball out rather than letting the referee decide to stop the game (14 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:51:44 -0500
    • Re: Why I hate it when teams play the ball out rather than letting the referee decide to stop the game (47 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:24:15 -0700
    • Re: Why I hate it when teams play the ball out rather than letting the referee decide to stop the game (33 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:52:12 -0400