SOCREF-L Archives – September 2008, week 4

1. "Offside" player involvement - Help!
   • "Offside" player involvement - Help! (32 lines)
     From: Brenton Hammons <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:35:56 -0400
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (39 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:46:29 -0400
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (38 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:56:15 -0400
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (32 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:13:08 -0400
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (41 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:42:41 -0700
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (38 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:10:22 -0400
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (29 lines)
     From: Brenton Hammons <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:33:54 -0400
   • Re: "Offside" player involvement - Help! (38 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:42:33 -0400

2. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (15 lines)
     From: Bob Chappuis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:15:49 -0400
   • <No subject> (48 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:39:29 -0400

3. ARs and advantage
   • ARs and advantage (46 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:05:48 -0700
   • Re: ARs and advantage (69 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:18:32 -0700
   • Re: ARs and advantage (30 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:03:50 -0700
   • Re: ARs and advantage (58 lines)
     From: Jorge L. Gimeno <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:23:31 -0700
   • Re: ARs and advantage (47 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:42:17 +0000
   • Re: ARs and advantage (98 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:27:04 -0700
   • Re: ARs and advantage (112 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:31:38 -0400

4. Assessing in Dallas -- Classic League
   • Assessing in Dallas -- Classic League (43 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:34:13 -0400

5. Balilla Whistles
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (23 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:04:51 -0400
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (35 lines)
     From: Tony Heaney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:24:56 -0700
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (49 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:42:08 +0000
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (60 lines)
     From: Tony Heaney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:41:08 -0700
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (69 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:03:11 -0700
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (28 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:54:49 -0400
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (40 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:08:37 -0400
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (39 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:54:35 -0700
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (50 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:27:44 -0400
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (56 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:20:38 -0700
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (68 lines)
     From: Jorge L. Gimeno <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:30:12 -0700
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (78 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:22:53 -0400
   • Re: Balilla Whistles (94 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:53:10 -0700

6. Can A Net be the Perfect Defender?
   • Can A Net be the Perfect Defender? (48 lines)
     From: Jim Teahan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:51:14 -0400
   • Re: Can A Net be the Perfect Defender? (34 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:10:02 -0500
   • Re: Can A Net be the Perfect Defender? (46 lines)
     From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:21:39 -0700

7. Duties of Club linesmen [was Can A Net be the Perfect Defender?]
   • Duties of Club linesmen [was Can A Net be the Perfect Defender?] (31 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:47:13 -0700

8. Hip Charges
   • Hip Charges (34 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:18:04 -0700

9. Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly
   • Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (99 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:46:02 -0400
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (137 lines)
     From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:18:48 -0400
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (45 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:58:01 -0400
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (38 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:30:47 -0500
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (24 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:17:56 -0400
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (38 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:22:55 -0500
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (64 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:20:31 +0000
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (126 lines)
     From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:09:48 -0400
   • Re: Impeding, Obstruction, Charging unfairly (54 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:37:10 -0700

10. NFHS IFK for keeper part two
    • NFHS IFK for keeper part two (23 lines)
      From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:25:53 -0400
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (68 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:46:04 -0700
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (47 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:02:25 +0000
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (90 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:28:38 -0400
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (60 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:35:10 -0700
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (66 lines)
      From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:14:53 -0400
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (40 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:27:52 +0000
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (75 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:13:18 +0000
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (106 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:34:07 -0700
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (127 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:51:39 -0700
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (175 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:11:26 -0400
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (185 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:54:46 -0400
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (130 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:24:17 -0700
    • Re: NFHS IFK for keeper part two (164 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:08:59 -0400

11. NFHS Red, should team play down? - The rest of the story
    • NFHS Red, should team play down? - The rest of the story (114 lines)
      From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:15:12 -0700

12. NFHS Rules
    • NFHS Rules (21 lines)
      From: Wendell Crain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:30:05 -0400

13. NFHS Rules - not electronic
    • Re: NFHS Rules - not electronic (28 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:03:43 -0400
    • Re: NFHS Rules - not electronic (50 lines)
      From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:24:19 -0400
    • NFHS Rules - not electronic (30 lines)
      From: Wendell Crain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:42:29 -0400

14. Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship
    • Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (16 lines)
      From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:46:38 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (35 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:05:59 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (46 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:13:19 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (28 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:30:31 -0500
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (63 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:21:16 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (43 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:57:27 -0700
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (42 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:04:03 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (37 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:19:40 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (61 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:40:55 -0400
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (60 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:11:34 -0700
    • Re: Officials award a phantom goal in the English League Championship (65 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:55:49 +0000

15. Other SFP
    • Re: Other SFP (24 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:13:13 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:19:35 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (50 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:56:09 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (76 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:46:20 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (79 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:19:42 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (38 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:09:00 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (45 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:34:10 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (46 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:36:21 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (26 lines)
      From: David Bassett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:07:57 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (60 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:18:18 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (19 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:07:40 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (70 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:33:54 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (40 lines)
      From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:18:44 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (60 lines)
      From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:01:45 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (56 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:17:39 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (48 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:50:04 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (41 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:06:18 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (26 lines)
      From: Patrick Chambers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:33:22 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (42 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:57:29 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (44 lines)
      From: Tom Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:05:24 EDT
    • Re: Other SFP (32 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:07:47 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (68 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:55:57 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (24 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:21:44 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (84 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:12:25 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (100 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:20:48 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (41 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:59:06 -0500
    • Re: Other SFP (43 lines)
      From: Patrick Chambers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:09:31 -0400
    • Re: Other SFP (32 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:09:47 -0500
    • Re: Other SFP (64 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:40:03 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (77 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:54:01 +0000
    • Re: Other SFP (84 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:51:37 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (45 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:21:50 -0500
    • Re: Other SFP (60 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:28:04 -0700
    • Re: Other SFP (53 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:49:20 -0500
    • Re: Other SFP (94 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:48:37 -0500
    • Re: Other SFP (34 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:25:04 +0000

16. phanton PK
    • Re: phanton PK (51 lines)
      From: Gary Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:30:08 -0400

17. RE John Terry Red Card
    • RE John Terry Red Card (49 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:40:10 -0700
    • Re: RE John Terry Red Card (14 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:18:13 -0400
    • Re: RE John Terry Red Card (83 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:16:56 -0700

18. Reading-Watford phantom goal
    • Reading-Watford phantom goal (75 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:24:40 -0700

19. Reality Check on Restart after play stopped solely for misconduct
    • Re: Reality Check on Restart after play stopped solely for misconduct (47 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:17:30 -0400
    • Re: Reality Check on Restart after play stopped solely for misconduct (63 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:51:09 -0700
    • Re: Reality Check on Restart after play stopped solely for misconduct (38 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:06:31 -0400
    • Re: Reality Check on Restart after play stopped solely for misconduct (60 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:15:51 -0700

20. Ref test?
    • Re: Ref test? (25 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:46:33 -0700

21. restart after disallowed goal (was: RE: You are the Ref)
    • restart after disallowed goal (was: RE: You are the Ref) (79 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:37:49 +0000
    • Re: restart after disallowed goal (was: RE: You are the Ref) (121 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:16:42 -0500

22. Scary goalkeeper
    • Scary goalkeeper (23 lines)
      From: Andrew Ashmall-Liversidge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:46:34 -0400
    • Re: Scary goalkeeper (33 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:33:43 -0700
    • Re: Scary goalkeeper (48 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:02:50 -0400
    • Re: Scary goalkeeper (10 lines)
      From: James Thomson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:20:09 +0000

23. Trailing AR
    • Trailing AR (39 lines)
      From: Ian Tooze <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:28:19 -0400
    • Re: Trailing AR (65 lines)
      From: Billingsley, Scott <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:44:28 -0700
    • Re: Trailing AR (41 lines)
      From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:36:14 -0700

24. Worst ref ever
    • Worst ref ever (25 lines)
      From: Ian Tooze <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:38:10 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (50 lines)
      From: Michael Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:30:57 -0500
    • Re: Worst ref ever (26 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:42:33 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (28 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:51:15 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (34 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:54:10 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (68 lines)
      From: Tim Mortimore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:54:26 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (58 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:00:46 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (24 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:36:19 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (25 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:00:05 -0500
    • Re: Worst ref ever (35 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:21:30 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (50 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:00:59 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (43 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:04:49 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (44 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:44:50 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (26 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:17:02 -0500
    • Re: Worst ref ever (46 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:29:09 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (36 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:43:56 -0400
    • Re: Worst ref ever (58 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:14:36 EDT
    • Re: Worst ref ever (40 lines)
      From: Tim Mortimore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:00:21 -0700
    • Re: Worst ref ever (49 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:09:17 -0700

25. You are the Ref
    • You are the Ref (25 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:43:04 -0500
    • Re: You are the Ref (71 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:22:11 -0700
    • Re: You are the Ref (80 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:51:36 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref (48 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:18:11 -0500
    • Re: You are the Ref (45 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:30:28 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref (41 lines)
      From: Bob Chappuis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:56:32 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref (63 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:54:00 -0500
    • Re: You are the Ref (81 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:07:18 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref (96 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:13:57 -0500
    • Re: You are the Ref (54 lines)
      From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:27:40 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref (92 lines)
      From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:30:26 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref (108 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:28:55 -0700
    • Re: You are the Ref (127 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:42:42 -0500
    • Re: You are the Ref (156 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:12:07 -0400

26. YOU ARE THE REF
    • YOU ARE THE REF (25 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:22:33 -0500
    • Re: YOU ARE THE REF (41 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:43:49 -0700
    • Re: YOU ARE THE REF (43 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:31:32 -0700
    • Re: YOU ARE THE REF (57 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:04:59 -0500
    • Re: YOU ARE THE REF (74 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:29:23 -0500
    • Re: YOU ARE THE REF (75 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:30:51 -0700

27. You are the Ref in the Guardian
    • You are the Ref in the Guardian (17 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:16:59 -0500
    • Re: You are the Ref in the Guardian (18 lines)
      From: Joe Makowiec <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:38:18 -0400
    • Re: You are the Ref in the Guardian (30 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:26:26 -0500