SOCREF-L Archives – October 2008, week 1

1. Background check, was: SSN as identifier (Was: RE: new cal south requirement)
   • Re: Background check, was: SSN as identifier (Was: RE: new cal south requirement) (48 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:03:32 -0500

2. background checks (was new cal south requirement)
   • Re: background checks (was new cal south requirement) (84 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:39:38 -0700
   • Re: background checks (was new cal south requirement) (34 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:46:06 -0400
   • Re: background checks (was new cal south requirement) (47 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:54:26 -0700
   • Re: background checks (was new cal south requirement) (58 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:20:12 -0700

3. Big Ten College Attire
   • Big Ten College Attire (15 lines)
     From: Jeff Greene <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:42:54 +0000
   • Re: Big Ten College Attire (34 lines)
     From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:08:00 -0700

4. College Send Off
   • College Send Off (35 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:27:37 -0400
   • Re: College Send Off (24 lines)
     From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:55:09 EDT
   • Re: College Send Off (63 lines)
     From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:11:02 -0400
   • Re: College Send Off (60 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:27:11 -0700

5. Davino Handling
   • Davino Handling (39 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:34:41 -0400

6. FW: uefa League Winner
   • FW: uefa League Winner (38 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 05:45:06 +0000
   • Re: FW: uefa League Winner (17 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:29:55 -0400

7. Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend
   • Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:41:35 -0400
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (95 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:28:18 -0700
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (32 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:34:57 -0400
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (104 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:44:00 -0700
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (48 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:11:06 -0400
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (82 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:25:45 -0400
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (21 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:22:52 -0700
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (109 lines)
     From: Ralph_Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:58:28 -0400
   • Re: Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (41 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:29:52 -0400
   • Had to Dismiss a Coach this Weekend (31 lines)
     From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 18:23:20 -0400

8. John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer)
   • John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (17 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:32:34 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (17 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:41:47 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (23 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:45:29 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (29 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:53:37 -0500
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (12 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:06:34 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (18 lines)
     From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:12:23 -0700
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (44 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:28:09 -0700
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (34 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:26:07 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (47 lines)
     From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:49:04 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (50 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:28:31 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (27 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:52:32 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (30 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:54:27 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (71 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:59:58 -0700
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (90 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:28:32 -0700
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (90 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:52:54 -0500
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (119 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:00:55 -0400
   • Re: John Cleese explains American football (vs soccer) (44 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:24:59 -0700

9. Kevin Stott off FIFA list??
   • Kevin Stott off FIFA list?? (30 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:25:24 -0400
   • Re: Kevin Stott off FIFA list?? (35 lines)
     From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:15:12 -0500
   • Re: Kevin Stott off FIFA list?? (48 lines)
     From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:30:58 -0700

10. lack of affiliated games in SoCal (Was: background checks)
    • lack of affiliated games in SoCal (Was: background checks) (34 lines)
      From: Mike Hayford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 09:31:09 -0700
    • Re: lack of affiliated games in SoCal (Was: background checks) (59 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:06:41 -0700
    • Re: lack of affiliated games in SoCal (Was: background checks) (21 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:38:48 -0700
    • Re: lack of affiliated games in SoCal (Was: background checks) (25 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:31:17 -0400
    • Re: lack of affiliated games in SoCal (Was: background checks) (40 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:54:19 -0700

11. Lover Likes Signals
    • Re: Lover Likes Signals (28 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:56:40 -0700
    • Re: Lover Likes Signals (44 lines)
      From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:37:18 -0400
    • Re: Lover Likes Signals (66 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:23:16 -0700
    • Re: Lover Likes Signals (62 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:48:42 -0700
    • Re: Lover Likes Signals (79 lines)
      From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:17:52 -0400

12. MLS Week in Review
    • MLS Week in Review (16 lines)
      From: Brenton Hammons <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:03:14 -0400
    • Re: MLS Week in Review (22 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:04:37 -0700

13. new cal south requirement
    • Re: new cal south requirement (47 lines)
      From: Mike Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:49:13 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requirement (90 lines)
      From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:54:18 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requirement (55 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:29:09 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requirement (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:43:26 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requirement (25 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:28:13 -0500
    • Re: new cal south requirement (48 lines)
      From: Mike Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:37:09 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requirement (35 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:55:44 -0500
    • Re: new cal south requirement (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:18:04 EDT
    • Re: new cal south requirement (52 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:20:17 -0500
    • Re: new cal south requirement (70 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:24:55 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requirement (27 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:06:46 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requirement (34 lines)
      From: Mike Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:46:40 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requirement (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:02:46 EDT
    • Re: new cal south requirement (171 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:22:09 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requirement (42 lines)
      From: Mike Woodring <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:36:15 -0600
    • Re: new cal south requirement (32 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:29:28 -0500
    • Re: new cal south requirement (187 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:56:10 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requirement (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:10:01 EDT
    • Re: new cal south requirement (54 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:22:52 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requirement (97 lines)
      From: Darrell A. Clay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:17:43 -0400

14. new cal south requriement
    • new cal south requriement (38 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:24:50 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requriement (53 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:39:36 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requriement (74 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:57:04 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requriement (48 lines)
      From: Larry Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:37:01 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requriement (50 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:43:23 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (55 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:21:50 EDT
    • Re: new cal south requriement (57 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:35:06 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (71 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:37:16 -0500
    • Re: new cal south requriement (94 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:02:57 EDT
    • Re: new cal south requriement (125 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:44:52 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requriement (164 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 21:55:39 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (90 lines)
      From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:04:48 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (46 lines)
      From: Jeremy Swan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:09:56 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (52 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 21:35:16 -0700
    • Re: new cal south requriement (55 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 07:32:45 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (49 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:26:09 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (53 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:54:25 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (52 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:10:32 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (57 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:23:14 -0400
    • Re: new cal south requriement (24 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:57:56 -0700

15. Offside explained by John Cleese
    • Offside explained by John Cleese (13 lines)
      From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:40:12 -0400
    • Re: Offside explained by John Cleese (93 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:49:00 -0400

16. Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads)
    • Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (19 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:30:08 -0400
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (42 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:48:09 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (68 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:07:10 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (67 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:11:19 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (84 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:15:27 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (36 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:15:29 -0500
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (79 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:19:55 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (46 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:21:57 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (90 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:23:32 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (21 lines)
      From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:31:42 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (27 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:33:39 -0500
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (29 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:14:32 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (27 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:32:12 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (87 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:26:18 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (97 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:31:15 -0700
    • Re: Referees Alone With Children (Was a few other threads) (68 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:01:07 -0400

17. Registering in another state, WAS: new cal south requriement
    • Registering in another state, WAS: new cal south requriement (56 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:18:03 -0400
    • Re: Registering in another state, WAS: new cal south requriement (96 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:42:36 -0700
    • Re: Registering in another state, WAS: new cal south requriement (125 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:51:50 -0400
    • Re: Registering in another state, WAS: new cal south requriement (28 lines)
      From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:01:02 -0700

18. Small-sided fields
    • Re: Small-sided fields (56 lines)
      From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:55:41 -0400
    • Re: Small-sided fields (70 lines)
      From: Richard Houser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 05:39:10 -0800
    • Re: Small-sided fields (97 lines)
      From: Tony Buckett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:51:07 -0400
    • Re: Small-sided fields (48 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:40:26 -0400
    • Re: Small-sided fields (29 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:00:24 -0500

19. SSN as identifier (Was: RE: new cal south requirement)
    • SSN as identifier (Was: RE: new cal south requirement) (49 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 19:06:46 +0000
    • Re: SSN as identifier (Was: RE: new cal south requirement) (168 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:24:08 -0700
    • Re: SSN as identifier (Was: RE: new cal south requirement) (25 lines)
      From: Joe Makowiec <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:49:02 -0400