SOCREF-L Archives – October 2008, week 4

1. Chivas-Houston tonite
   • Chivas-Houston tonite (26 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:49:56 -0700
   • Re: Chivas-Houston tonite (41 lines)
     From: Jorge L. Gimeno <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:59:50 -0700

2. Classic Fun With Syntax (unintended meaning)
   • Classic Fun With Syntax (unintended meaning) (22 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:29:50 -0400

3. Handling or not.
   • Handling or not. (27 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:49:41 -0500
   • Re: Handling or not. (74 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:03:42 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (80 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:11:23 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (63 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:23:56 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (92 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:01:18 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (39 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:09:27 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (38 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:19:09 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (107 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:22:24 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (25 lines)
     From: Brenton Hammons <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:39:58 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (38 lines)
     From: Ralph_Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:40:39 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (49 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:04:17 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (70 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:35:51 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (41 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:53:39 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (34 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:27:59 +0000
   • Re: Handling or not. (61 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:50:50 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (27 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:59:46 -0500
   • Re: Handling or not. (42 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:37:26 -0500
   • Re: Handling or not. (31 lines)
     From: Dave Young <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:50:47 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (29 lines)
     From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:11:37 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (36 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:31:17 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (57 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:11:44 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (49 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:16:41 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (71 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:29:54 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (93 lines)
     From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:53:07 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (33 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:03:26 -0400
   • Re: Handling or not. (53 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:44:51 -0500
   • Re: Handling or not. (23 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:24:06 -0700
   • Re: Handling or not. (91 lines)
     From: Tom Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:30:36 EDT
   • Re: Handling or not. (32 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:47:22 -0400

4. Injury and time
   • Re: Injury and time (29 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:11:34 -0700
   • Re: Injury and time (44 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:34:46 -0700
   • Re: Injury and time (65 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:39:37 -0400

5. lack of courage (Was: RE: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution)
   • lack of courage (Was: RE: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution) (33 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:09:26 +0000

6. MD HS Play-Offs
   • MD HS Play-Offs (49 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:21:57 -0400
   • Re: MD HS Play-Offs (64 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:34:07 -0400
   • Re: MD HS Play-Offs (23 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:03:20 -0400
   • Re: MD HS Play-Offs (33 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:15:55 -0400
   • Re: MD HS Play-Offs (55 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:52:51 -0700
   • Re: MD HS Play-Offs (25 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:26:59 -0700

7. motivating a teen AR?
   • motivating a teen AR? (32 lines)
     From: Stan Sneath <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:57:43 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (46 lines)
     From: Mike Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:16:03 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (25 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:44:45 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (31 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:16:08 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (57 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:09:41 -0700
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (54 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:24:56 -0700
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (62 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:59:07 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (33 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:16:48 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (45 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:57:28 -0700
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (37 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:36:31 -0400
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (73 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:52:03 -0700
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (27 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:04:35 -0500
   • Re: motivating a teen AR? (24 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:43:33 -0400

8. NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution
   • NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (68 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:16:21 -0400
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (85 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:29:05 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (19 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:32:54 -0500
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (98 lines)
     From: Coach JMag (Hotmail) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:35:46 -0400
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (95 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:38:51 -0400
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (85 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:43:46 -0400
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (105 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:53:29 -0400
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (33 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:51:32 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (43 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:05:58 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (21 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:18:11 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (107 lines)
     From: Billingsley, Scott <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:56:37 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (26 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:25:15 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (59 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:57:19 -0400
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (36 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:01:49 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules conundrum: sub after caution (20 lines)
     From: Joe Makowiec <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:33:39 -0400

9. NFHS rules Question
   • NFHS rules Question (24 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:39:28 -0700
   • Re: NFHS rules Question (42 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:28:32 -0700

10. Proper terminology (Handling or not.)
    • Re: Proper terminology (Handling or not.) (49 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:50:54 -0700
    • Re: Proper terminology (Handling or not.) (91 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:05:16 -0700
    • Re: Proper terminology (Handling or not.) (28 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:27:48 -0500
    • Re: Proper terminology (Handling or not.) (45 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:34:28 -0700

11. sloppy terminology, was: Handling or not.
    • sloppy terminology, was: Handling or not. (20 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:25:57 -0500

12. Soccer referee fee issues in California
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (203 lines)
      From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:54:11 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (163 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:56:37 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (39 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:15:31 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (128 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:40:01 -0500
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (15 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:42:48 -0500
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (43 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:03:30 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (45 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:15:11 -0400
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (51 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:15:07 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (55 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:26:24 -0400
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (36 lines)
      From: Mike Hayford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:54:59 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (53 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:17:09 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (28 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:59:03 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (71 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:02:25 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (45 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:22:26 -0400
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (62 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:44:31 -0400
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (54 lines)
      From: Thomas Coatoam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:12:22 -0400
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (27 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:52:02 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (41 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:46 +0000
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (74 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:36:14 -0700
    • Re: Soccer referee fee issues in California (83 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:37:03 -0700

13. Stopping the clock to early
    • Stopping the clock to early (26 lines)
      From: Ian Tooze <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:12:28 -0400
    • Re: Stopping the clock to early (29 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:29:31 -0400
    • Re: Stopping the clock to early (68 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:56:28 -0700

14. Sub after caution #2
    • Sub after caution #2 (24 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:50:29 -0500
    • Re: Sub after caution #2 (55 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:30:12 -0400
    • Re: Sub after caution #2 (62 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:15:02 -0700

15. Time Out in MA high school soccer
    • Re: Time Out in MA high school soccer (32 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:37:05 -0700
    • Re: Time Out in MA high school soccer (33 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:11:47 -0600
    • Re: Time Out in MA high school soccer (34 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:38:15 -0400