SOCREF-L Archives – December 2008, week 2

1. Article from Post-Gazette
   • Article from Post-Gazette (183 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:15:35 -0500
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (109 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:55:09 -0800
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (54 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:02:09 -0600
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (39 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:17:07 -0800
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (135 lines)
     From: Dave Young <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:35:59 -0500
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (294 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:37:31 -0800
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (30 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:45:37 -0500
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (40 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:06:50 -0600
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (84 lines)
     From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:22:51 -0600
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (49 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:52:07 +0000
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (45 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:33:13 -0800
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette (39 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:40:51 -0800

2. Article from Post-Gazette + 10 years of reading the reports
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette + 10 years of reading the reports (40 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:00:31 -0500

3. Article from Post-Gazette + my thoughts and possible fix
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette + my thoughts and possible fix (57 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:13:09 -0500

4. Article from Post-Gazette + NFL football
   • Re: Article from Post-Gazette + NFL football (27 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:04:15 -0500

5. Comparison of NFHS & USSF rules (Was: RE: Article from Post-Gazette)
   • Comparison of NFHS & USSF rules (Was: RE: Article from Post-Gazette) (28 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:04:48 +0000
   • Re: Comparison of NFHS & USSF rules (Was: RE: Article from Post-Gazette) (39 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:20:59 -0500

6. Darf man so einen penalty schiessen?
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (25 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:47:50 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (49 lines)
     From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:04:50 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (43 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:14:10 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (41 lines)
     From: Dave Young <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:16:46 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (47 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:11:27 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (43 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:32:35 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (75 lines)
     From: Cohen, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:17:31 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (86 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:04:39 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (13 lines)
     From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:15:20 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (19 lines)
     From: Josh Boylan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:36:56 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (103 lines)
     From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:01:33 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (48 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:21:11 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (34 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:57:52 -0600
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (42 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:26:50 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (26 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:24:44 -0600
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (39 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:45:44 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (32 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:56:06 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (43 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:14:05 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (98 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:16:17 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (110 lines)
     From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:45:40 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (57 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:02:25 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (130 lines)
     From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:15:59 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (50 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:16:33 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (153 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:29:49 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (17 lines)
     From: Dave Young <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:39:25 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (38 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:50:59 -0600
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (26 lines)
     From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:53:13 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (30 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:57:38 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (46 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:59:51 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (36 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:05:28 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (72 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:14:37 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (42 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:09:15 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (49 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:10:15 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (15 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:32:53 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (31 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:58:01 -0600
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (59 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:16:19 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (34 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:36:04 -0600
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (56 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:11:31 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (16 lines)
     From: Kevin Watts <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:12:49 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (30 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:35:23 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (84 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:49:21 -0600
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (19 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:00:01 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (55 lines)
     From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:16:29 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (38 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:20:06 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (114 lines)
     From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:14:49 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (31 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:17:14 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (46 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:06:26 -0500

7. Deciding when a snowy turf field to dangerous to play on?
   • Re: Deciding when a snowy turf field to dangerous to play on? (62 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 23:04:23 -0600
   • Re: Deciding when a snowy turf field to dangerous to play on? (48 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:13:07 -0600
   • Re: Deciding when a snowy turf field to dangerous to play on? (56 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:49:15 -0600

8. Fw: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen (retry)
   • Fw: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen (retry) (46 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:13:14 -0500

9. Fw: RE: Sport season lawsuit - was Article from Post-Gazette
   • Fw: RE: Sport season lawsuit - was Article from Post-Gazette (154 lines)
     From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:45:27 -0800

10. Fwd: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette
    • Fwd: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (48 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:39:34 -0600

11. Goalkeeper Science
    • Goalkeeper Science (69 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:15:13 -0800

12. I don't have the new LOTG Book
    • I don't have the new LOTG Book (16 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:27:23 -0500
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (15 lines)
      From: Mike McCoy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:37:53 EST
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (26 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:39:50 -0800
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (23 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:33:57 -0600
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (27 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:25:46 -0500
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (32 lines)
      From: Craig & Maggie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:16:48 -0600
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (37 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:50:57 -0500
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (56 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:59:35 -0800
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (40 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:33:41 +0000
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (30 lines)
      From: Tom Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:22:56 -0500
    • Re: I don't have the new LOTG Book (80 lines)
      From: Les Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:04:29 -0500

13. IFAB grammar
    • IFAB grammar (40 lines)
      From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:47:38 -0500
    • Re: IFAB grammar (38 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:35:55 -0600
    • Re: IFAB grammar (40 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:26:38 -0600

14. ND-NC women's game; no score
    • Re: ND-NC women's game; no score (20 lines)
      From: Edward Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:05:46 -0500

15. NFHS Rules Committee set-up
    • NFHS Rules Committee set-up (80 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:52:44 -0500

16. Sbustitutions, was Article from Post-Gazette
    • Sbustitutions, was Article from Post-Gazette (150 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:53:23 -0800

17. Scarrry Tackles
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (20 lines)
      From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:57:09 -0500
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (42 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:17:52 -0600
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (35 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:19:58 -0800
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (52 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:48:11 -0800
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (32 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:20:30 -0500
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (52 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:58:31 +0000
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (32 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:07:03 -0600
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (50 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:42:04 -0800
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (30 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:09:01 -0500

18. Sport season lawsuit - was Article from Post-Gazette
    • Re: Sport season lawsuit - was Article from Post-Gazette (99 lines)
      From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:17:16 -0800

19. Statues
    • Re: Statues (36 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:52:19 -0800
    • Re: Statues (83 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:27:48 +0000
    • Re: Statues (27 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:58:24 -0500
    • Re: Statues (31 lines)
      From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:00:04 -0500
    • Re: Statues (53 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:57:33 -0800
    • Re: Statues (59 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:11:28 -0800
    • Re: Statues (73 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:19:19 -0800
    • Re: Statues (45 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:07:06 -0500
    • Re: Statues (66 lines)
      From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:28:30 -0500

20. Whistling to Proceed
    • Whistling to Proceed (43 lines)
      From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:50:07 -0500
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (57 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:02:17 -0500
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (79 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:04:30 -0800
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (153 lines)
      From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:10:10 -0500
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (171 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:02:40 -0800
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (195 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:34:10 -0800
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (219 lines)
      From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:55:25 -0500
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (49 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:19:09 -0500
    • Re: Whistling to Proceed (75 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:42:46 -0500

21. [BULK] Re: Scarrry Tackles
    • Re: [BULK] Re: Scarrry Tackles (94 lines)
      From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:43:17 -0500
    • Re: [BULK] Re: Scarrry Tackles (28 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:56:12 -0600
    • Re: [BULK] Re: Scarrry Tackles (20 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:04:55 -0800
    • Re: [BULK] Re: Scarrry Tackles (53 lines)
      From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:08:47 -0500
    • Re: [BULK] Re: Scarrry Tackles (118 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:27:33 -0500

22. [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette
    • [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (48 lines)
      From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:32:39 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (51 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:37:01 -0800
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (70 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:05:16 -0600
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (72 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:50:28 -0600
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (68 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:10:03 -0800
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (21 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:18:54 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (52 lines)
      From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:31:55 -0800
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (40 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:42:55 -0800
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (62 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:02:31 +0000
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (31 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:35:02 -0600
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (31 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:34:26 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] Article from Post-Gazette (58 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:17:57 -0600