SOCREF-L Archives – December 2008, week 3

1. "fooking" Was: written tests
   • "fooking" Was: written tests (71 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:31:00 -0500
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (98 lines)
     From: Judy Gray <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:57:40 -0500
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (22 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:04:22 -0800
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (29 lines)
     From: Tony Heaney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:19:06 -0800
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (47 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:28:10 -0800
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (52 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:38:08 -0800
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (77 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:36:07 -0500
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (93 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:00:25 -0800
   • Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (21 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:36:17 -0500

2. AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration
   • AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (15 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:56:47 -0500
   • Re: AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (29 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:04:36 -0600
   • Re: AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (33 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:41:44 -0500
   • Re: AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (30 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:47:47 -0500
   • Re: AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (17 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:26:23 -0500
   • Re: AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (37 lines)
     From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:02:46 -0500
   • Re: AS Roma - Vucinic goal celebration (57 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:31:25 -0600

3. background checks
   • background checks (26 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:01:27 -0600
   • Re: background checks (29 lines)
     From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:20:36 -0500
   • Re: background checks (47 lines)
     From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:21:35 -0800
   • Re: background checks (60 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:26:57 -0800
   • Re: background checks (49 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:59:32 -0800
   • Re: background checks (19 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:35:52 -0500
   • Re: background checks (72 lines)
     From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:50:28 -0800
   • Re: background checks (88 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:04:59 -0800
   • Re: background checks (104 lines)
     From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:34:15 -0800

4. background checks (Massachusetts style)
   • Re: background checks (Massachusetts style) (73 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:20:52 -0500

5. Blind referees
   • Blind referees (21 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:29:50 -0600
   • Re: Blind referees (28 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:41:26 -0500
   • Re: Blind referees (81 lines)
     From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:52:55 -0800
   • Re: Blind referees (40 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:30:28 -0600

6. Darf man so einen penalty schiessen?
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (26 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:23:37 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (24 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:19:51 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (29 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:50:38 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (37 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:36:51 -0800
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (26 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:30:29 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (52 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:35:28 -0500
   • Re: Darf man so einen penalty schiessen? (36 lines)
     From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:39:51 -0600

7. End of encroachment at Free Kicks?
   • End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (22 lines)
     From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:40:47 -0800
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (33 lines)
     From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:30:10 -0800
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (44 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:39:14 -0800
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (19 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:44:45 -0600
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (55 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:15:33 -0500
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (65 lines)
     From: Josh Boylan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:33:40 -0500
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (30 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:29:46 -0500
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (56 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:54:07 -0800
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (32 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:34:57 -0500
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (18 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:59:05 -0500
   • Re: End of encroachment at Free Kicks? (40 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:23:59 -0800

8. IFAB grammar
   • Re: IFAB grammar (30 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:59:07 -0500

9. IFAB membership (was: RE: Darf man ...)
   • IFAB membership (was: RE: Darf man ...) (36 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:11:50 +0000

10. Incident in the West Ham
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham (31 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:52:32 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham (47 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:30:42 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham (71 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:58:21 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham (97 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:43:09 -0500

11. Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (no spoiler)
    • Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (no spoiler) (27 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:15:53 -0500

12. Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER)
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (39 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:57:15 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (49 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:06:02 -0700
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (35 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:20:47 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (55 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:31:38 -0800
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (57 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:41:39 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (80 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:52:07 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (101 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:07:25 -0600
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (66 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:28:58 -0500
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham vs. Aston Villa match yesterday (SPOILER) (115 lines)
      From: Edward Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:14:45 -0800

13. Incident in the West Ham-is the horse dead yet?
    • Re: Incident in the West Ham-is the horse dead yet? (50 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:02:34 -0500

14. Man U vs Gamba (no score)
    • Man U vs Gamba (no score) (13 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:43:41 -0500

15. NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler)
    • NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (21 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:18:29 -0500
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (39 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:55:13 -0600
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (47 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:18:33 -0800
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (79 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:40:35 -0500
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (107 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:52:15 -0600
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (20 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:58:53 EST
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (46 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:42:31 -0500
    • Re: NCAA Final UNC vs ND women (spoiler) (39 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:00:51 -0800

16. NFHS home school decides playability - not soccer
    • NFHS home school decides playability - not soccer (38 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:26:49 -0500
    • Re: NFHS home school decides playability - not soccer (50 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:35:33 -0500

17. Not soccer but relevant
    • Not soccer but relevant (21 lines)
      From: Jim Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:15:57 -0500

18. Pigeon killing soccer player
    • Pigeon killing soccer player (39 lines)
      From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:45:58 -0500
    • Re: Pigeon killing soccer player (51 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:52:34 -0500
    • Re: Pigeon killing soccer player (72 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:38:31 -0500
    • Re: Pigeon killing soccer player (87 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:32:30 -0500
    • Re: Pigeon killing soccer player (111 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:54:58 -0800
    • Re: Pigeon killing soccer player (113 lines)
      From: Mark Goorsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:11:25 -0800

19. Scarrry Tackles
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (25 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:52:44 -0600
    • Re: Scarrry Tackles (46 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:22:37 -0500

20. Shoes
    • Shoes (25 lines)
      From: Gary Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:37:48 -0800
    • Re: Shoes (42 lines)
      From: Gus Martinez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:48:03 -0500
    • Re: Shoes (46 lines)
      From: Hugh Griffis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:16:22 -0600

21. shoes
    • shoes (21 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:56:30 -0600

22. Shoes
    • Re: Shoes (54 lines)
      From: Judy Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:47:40 -0500
    • Re: Shoes (54 lines)
      From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:58:29 -0800
    • Re: Shoes (47 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:16:28 -0600
    • Re: Shoes (41 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:14:36 -0600
    • Re: Shoes (17 lines)
      From: Brenton Hammons <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:48:20 -0500

23. SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change)
    • SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (33 lines)
      From: Michael Foerster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:28:39 -0500
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (64 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:02:35 -0800
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (38 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:15:45 -0800
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (69 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:53:57 -0800
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (95 lines)
      From: Josh Boylan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:18:50 -0500
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (25 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:07:15 -0800
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (25 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:13:58 -0600
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (100 lines)
      From: Gary Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:30:59 -0600
    • Re: SocRef and the LAW! (was Re: unapproved rule change) (69 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:37:57 -0800

24. The end of encroachment at Free Kicks??
    • The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (11 lines)
      From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:39:53 -0800
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (23 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:00:17 -0800
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (32 lines)
      From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:04:09 -0800
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (24 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:04:31 -0500
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (60 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:11:37 +0000
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (62 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:33:00 -0500
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (80 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:05:52 -0600
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (68 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:27:14 -0800
    • Re: The end of encroachment at Free Kicks?? (27 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:01:12 -0500

25. The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted)
    • The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (119 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:40:05 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (134 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:57:31 +0000
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (34 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:23:19 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (127 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:59:03 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (30 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:30:12 -0600
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (22 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:38:13 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (50 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:05:09 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (31 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:11:13 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (51 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:26:40 -0800
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (56 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:21:09 -0800
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (152 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 07:19:23 -0600
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (48 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:33:59 -0500
    • Re: The frustration of taking written tests (questions and/or answers poorly vetted) (13 lines)
      From: chester miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:48:28 -0500

26. unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?)
    • unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (31 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:59:30 +0000
    • Re: unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (59 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:34:26 -0500
    • Re: unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (128 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:06:50 -0800
    • Re: unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (40 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:46:10 -0600
    • Re: unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (35 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:35:23 -0800
    • Re: unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (70 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:10:57 +0000
    • Re: unapproved rule change (was: RE: What's the restart?) (59 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:32:58 EST

27. What's the restart?
    • What's the restart? (24 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:51:39 -0500
    • Re: What's the restart? (44 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:57:54 -0800
    • Re: What's the restart? (37 lines)
      From: Jorge L. Gimeno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:58:08 -0800
    • Re: What's the restart? (39 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:56:54 -0600
    • Re: What's the restart? (113 lines)
      From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:25:15 -0500
    • Re: What's the restart? (17 lines)
      From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:38:18 -0500
    • Re: What's the restart? (32 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:57:11 -0500
    • Re: What's the restart? (35 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:44:51 +0000
    • Re: What's the restart? (51 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:02:57 EST
    • Re: What's the restart? (28 lines)
      From: CW Rice <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:41:24 -0500

28. written tests
    • written tests (33 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:19:02 -0800
    • Re: written tests (46 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:26:56 -0500
    • Re: written tests (47 lines)
      From: Tom Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:48:56 -0500
    • Re: written tests (35 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:20:28 -0600
    • Re: written tests (61 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:21:43 -0800
    • Re: written tests (58 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:26:24 -0500
    • Re: written tests (67 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:38:30 -0800
    • Re: written tests (80 lines)
      From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:46:59 -0500
    • Re: written tests (111 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:15:01 +0000
    • Re: written tests (58 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:44:33 -0500
    • Re: written tests (55 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:47:43 -0500
    • Re: written tests (104 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:50:31 -0500
    • Re: written tests (48 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:52:10 -0500
    • Re: written tests (69 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:06:34 -0500
    • Re: written tests (70 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:06:31 -0800
    • Re: written tests (77 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:27:10 -0800

29. written tests (care to write some)
    • written tests (care to write some) (34 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:12:14 -0500
    • Re: written tests (care to write some) (33 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:17:46 -0600
    • Re: written tests (care to write some) (38 lines)
      From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:26:37 -0500

30. written tests - how they come to be
    • Re: written tests - how they come to be (32 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:16:39 -0500

31. [BULK] Re: "fooking" Was: written tests
    • Re: [BULK] Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (186 lines)
      From: Brian Doucette <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:04:17 -0500
    • Re: [BULK] Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (208 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:55:21 -0500
    • Re: [BULK] Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (228 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:09:33 -0800
    • Re: [BULK] Re: "fooking" Was: written tests (33 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:10:28 +0000