SOCREF-L Archives – February 2009, week 1

1. charging
   • charging (17 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:53:10 -0600
   • Re: charging (33 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:31:19 -0800
   • Re: charging (40 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:00:40 -0800

2. Fair is fair, or is it?
   • Re: Fair is fair, or is it? (55 lines)
     From: Mark Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:06:14 +1100
   • Fair is fair, or is it? (44 lines)
     From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:55:09 -0800

3. Fair Play leaves Illinois
   • Fair Play leaves Illinois (19 lines)
     From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:35:54 -0500
   • Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois (48 lines)
     From: Bruce Bode <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:27:34 -0600
   • Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois (64 lines)
     From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:03:35 -0600
   • Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois (94 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:38:14 -0800
   • Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois (30 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:34:57 -0500
   • Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois (17 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:02:01 -0500
   • Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois (51 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:47:03 -0500

4. Frank's Free
   • Frank's Free (22 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:05:58 -0800
   • Re: Frank's Free (43 lines)
     From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:10:52 -0500
   • Re: Frank's Free (50 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:45:11 -0600
   • Re: Frank's Free (23 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:35:33 -0500
   • Re: Frank's Free (51 lines)
     From: Bruce Bode <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:55:23 -0600
   • Re: Frank's Free (15 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:11:15 -0800
   • Re: Frank's Free (20 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:36:24 -0800
   • Re: Frank's Free (29 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:48:47 -0600
   • Re: Frank's Free (32 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:13:03 -0500

5. hit 5 times
   • hit 5 times (34 lines)
     From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:32:37 -0500

6. Hit Five Times
   • Re: Hit Five Times (87 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:03:24 -0800
   • Re: Hit Five Times (30 lines)
     From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:27:17 -0500
   • Re: Hit Five Times (69 lines)
     From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:27:22 -0500
   • Re: Hit Five Times (33 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:38:40 -0800
   • Re: Hit Five Times (84 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:55:24 -0800
   • Re: Hit Five Times (96 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:59:03 -0600

7. liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
   • liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (27 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:39:30 -0800
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (41 lines)
     From: Larry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:20:57 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (57 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:45:29 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (71 lines)
     From: Ron Lagraff <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:57:39 +0000
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (47 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:09:14 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (62 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:38:06 -0800
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (73 lines)
     From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:03:21 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (25 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:18:42 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (44 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:36:13 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (49 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:12:01 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (59 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:50:11 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (22 lines)
     From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:28:57 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (17 lines)
     From: Ed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:23:00 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (30 lines)
     From: Josh Boylan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:39:19 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (24 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:41:26 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:20:21 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (12 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:23:38 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (39 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:05:54 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (18 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:41:51 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (67 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:54:04 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (47 lines)
     From: Keith Powell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:14:59 EST
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (21 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:40 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (81 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:38:19 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (15 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:40:18 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (99 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:57:44 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (46 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:44:58 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (69 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:08:10 -0800
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (28 lines)
     From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:09:11 +0000
   • liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (15 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:53:16 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (42 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:05:01 +0000
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (32 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:06:51 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (25 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:15:36 -0800
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (43 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:53:58 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (24 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:41:20 -0800
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (23 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:29:03 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (50 lines)
     From: Bruce Bode <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:45:22 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (22 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:37:30 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (80 lines)
     From: Bruce Bode <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:38:26 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (78 lines)
     From: Alan Knight <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:10:55 -0500
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (44 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:32:11 -0800
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (51 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:03:03 -0600
   • Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE (91 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:21:07 -0500

8. Looking for refs in/near Mandeville, Louisiana
   • Looking for refs in/near Mandeville, Louisiana (66 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:32:29 -0500
   • Re: Looking for refs in/near Mandeville, Louisiana (84 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:36:19 -0500

9. New term?
   • New term? (26 lines)
     From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:22:50 -0800

10. Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
    • Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (22 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:22:55 -0500
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (37 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:34:16 -0500
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (33 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:45:02 -0700
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (54 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:14:11 +0000
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (57 lines)
      From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:16:29 -0800
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (22 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:33:46 -0800
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (88 lines)
      From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:25:00 -0800
    • Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q (34 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:04:31 -0500

11. Tackling and exposed studs
    • Tackling and exposed studs (21 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:03:39 -0500
    • Re: Tackling and exposed studs (49 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:48:37 -0500
    • Re: Tackling and exposed studs (76 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:50:49 -0500
    • Re: Tackling and exposed studs (54 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:21:25 -0500
    • Re: Tackling and exposed studs (90 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:46 -0800
    • Re: Tackling and exposed studs (68 lines)
      From: Craig & Maggie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:33:46 -0600
    • Re: Tackling and exposed studs (23 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:16:02 -0500

12. training directiions
    • Re: training directiions (52 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:07:18 -0800

13. traveling to Southwest
    • traveling to Southwest (24 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:06:40 -0600

14. [UBE?] July - Minnesota - Referees needed
    • [UBE?] July - Minnesota - Referees needed (33 lines)
      From: Michael F. Rolfes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:28:03 -0600