SOCREF-L Archives – February 2009, week 1
charging
charging
(17 lines)
From:
Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:53:10 -0600
Re: charging
(33 lines)
From:
Lawrence Savell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:31:19 -0800
Re: charging
(40 lines)
From:
Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:00:40 -0800
Fair is fair, or is it?
Re: Fair is fair, or is it?
(55 lines)
From:
Mark Gallagher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:06:14 +1100
Fair is fair, or is it?
(44 lines)
From:
Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:55:09 -0800
Fair Play leaves Illinois
Fair Play leaves Illinois
(19 lines)
From:
Joe Heneghan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:35:54 -0500
Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois
(48 lines)
From:
Bruce Bode <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:27:34 -0600
Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois
(64 lines)
From:
Glenn R Sogge <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:03:35 -0600
Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois
(94 lines)
From:
Patrick Duffy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:38:14 -0800
Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Voshol <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:34:57 -0500
Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois
(17 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:02:01 -0500
Re: Fair Play leaves Illinois
(51 lines)
From:
Mike Moore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:47:03 -0500
Frank's Free
Frank's Free
(22 lines)
From:
Wickham, Dennis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:05:58 -0800
Re: Frank's Free
(43 lines)
From:
Richard Critz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:10:52 -0500
Re: Frank's Free
(50 lines)
From:
Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:45:11 -0600
Re: Frank's Free
(23 lines)
From:
Rich Zumpone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:35:33 -0500
Re: Frank's Free
(51 lines)
From:
Bruce Bode <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:55:23 -0600
Re: Frank's Free
(15 lines)
From:
Jim Geissman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:11:15 -0800
Re: Frank's Free
(20 lines)
From:
Jim Geissman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:36:24 -0800
Re: Frank's Free
(29 lines)
From:
Vince Hradil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:48:47 -0600
Re: Frank's Free
(32 lines)
From:
Gil Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:13:03 -0500
hit 5 times
hit 5 times
(34 lines)
From:
ront02769 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:32:37 -0500
Hit Five Times
Re: Hit Five Times
(87 lines)
From:
Lawrence Savell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:03:24 -0800
Re: Hit Five Times
(30 lines)
From:
Jon Armstrong <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:27:17 -0500
Re: Hit Five Times
(69 lines)
From:
Mike Handler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:27:22 -0500
Re: Hit Five Times
(33 lines)
From:
Greg Dunlap <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:38:40 -0800
Re: Hit Five Times
(84 lines)
From:
Lawrence Savell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:55:24 -0800
Re: Hit Five Times
(96 lines)
From:
Vince Hradil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:59:03 -0600
liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(27 lines)
From:
lee jordan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:39:30 -0800
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(41 lines)
From:
Larry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:20:57 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(57 lines)
From:
Ed Marco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:45:29 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(71 lines)
From:
Ron Lagraff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:57:39 +0000
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(47 lines)
From:
Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:09:14 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(62 lines)
From:
Jim Geissman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:38:06 -0800
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Welnetz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:03:21 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(25 lines)
From:
Roger Domal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:18:42 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(44 lines)
From:
Ed Marco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:36:13 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(49 lines)
From:
Vince Hradil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:12:01 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(59 lines)
From:
Mike Moore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:50:11 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(22 lines)
From:
Doug Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:28:57 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(17 lines)
From:
Ed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:23:00 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(30 lines)
From:
Josh Boylan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:39:19 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(24 lines)
From:
Roger Domal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:41:26 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:20:21 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(12 lines)
From:
Roger Domal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:23:38 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Geissman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:05:54 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(18 lines)
From:
Roger Domal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:41:51 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(67 lines)
From:
Ed Marco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:54:04 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(47 lines)
From:
Keith Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:14:59 EST
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(21 lines)
From:
Rich Zumpone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:40 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(81 lines)
From:
Vince Hradil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:38:19 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(15 lines)
From:
Roger Domal <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:40:18 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(99 lines)
From:
Ed Marco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:57:44 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(46 lines)
From:
Gil Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:44:58 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(69 lines)
From:
Wickham, Dennis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:08:10 -0800
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(28 lines)
From:
Kevin Druff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:09:11 +0000
liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(15 lines)
From:
Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:53:16 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(42 lines)
From:
doug smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:05:01 +0000
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(32 lines)
From:
Ed Marco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:06:51 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(25 lines)
From:
lee jordan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:15:36 -0800
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(43 lines)
From:
Larry Stone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:53:58 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(24 lines)
From:
Jim Geissman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:41:20 -0800
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(23 lines)
From:
Vince Hradil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:29:03 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(50 lines)
From:
Bruce Bode <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:45:22 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(22 lines)
From:
George Parker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:37:30 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(80 lines)
From:
Bruce Bode <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:38:26 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(78 lines)
From:
Alan Knight <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:10:55 -0500
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Geissman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:32:11 -0800
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(51 lines)
From:
Vince Hradil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:03:03 -0600
Re: liverpool v chelsea NO SCSORE
(91 lines)
From:
Ed Marco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:21:07 -0500
Looking for refs in/near Mandeville, Louisiana
Looking for refs in/near Mandeville, Louisiana
(66 lines)
From:
Jim Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:32:29 -0500
Re: Looking for refs in/near Mandeville, Louisiana
(84 lines)
From:
Fred Speirs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:36:19 -0500
New term?
New term?
(26 lines)
From:
Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:22:50 -0800
Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(22 lines)
From:
CP Schwartz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:22:55 -0500
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(37 lines)
From:
Dave Wolgast <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:34:16 -0500
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(33 lines)
From:
Boerio, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:45:02 -0700
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(54 lines)
From:
doug smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:14:11 +0000
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(57 lines)
From:
Gary Saxer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:16:29 -0800
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(22 lines)
From:
Wickham, Dennis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:33:46 -0800
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(88 lines)
From:
Jim DeBrabander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:25:00 -0800
Re: Super Bowl - Harrison 15-yard penalty, 4th Q
(34 lines)
From:
Steve G <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:04:31 -0500
Tackling and exposed studs
Tackling and exposed studs
(21 lines)
From:
Rich Zumpone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:03:39 -0500
Re: Tackling and exposed studs
(49 lines)
From:
CP Schwartz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:48:37 -0500
Re: Tackling and exposed studs
(76 lines)
From:
Bill Liedtke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:50:49 -0500
Re: Tackling and exposed studs
(54 lines)
From:
Rich Zumpone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:21:25 -0500
Re: Tackling and exposed studs
(90 lines)
From:
Lawrence Savell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:46 -0800
Re: Tackling and exposed studs
(68 lines)
From:
Craig & Maggie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:33:46 -0600
Re: Tackling and exposed studs
(23 lines)
From:
CP Schwartz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:16:02 -0500
training directiions
Re: training directiions
(52 lines)
From:
Patrick Duffy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:07:18 -0800
traveling to Southwest
traveling to Southwest
(24 lines)
From:
Vince DeFranco <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:06:40 -0600
[UBE?] July - Minnesota - Referees needed
[UBE?] July - Minnesota - Referees needed
(33 lines)
From:
Michael F. Rolfes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:28:03 -0600
Back to the main SOCREF-L page
LISTSERV.URI.EDU