SOCREF-L Archives – February 2009, week 2

1. AFC Bournemouth Goal Celebration
   • AFC Bournemouth Goal Celebration (15 lines)
     From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:01:00 -0500
   • Re: AFC Bournemouth Goal Celebration (30 lines)
     From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:26:51 -0500
   • Re: AFC Bournemouth Goal Celebration (45 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:36:18 -0500

2. Blackburn vs. Coventry
   • Blackburn vs. Coventry (18 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:58:04 -0800

3. Bournemouth Goal Celebration
   • Re: Bournemouth Goal Celebration (31 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:39:36 -0500

4. Clinic Survey for Attendees
   • Clinic Survey for Attendees (21 lines)
     From: Matt O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:46:11 -0800
   • Re: Clinic Survey for Attendees (52 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:48:10 -0500

5. Female
   • Female (14 lines)
     From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:51:13 -0600

6. Fields (was rainy turf/Lightning)
   • Fields (was rainy turf/Lightning) (53 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:52:31 -0500
   • Re: Fields (was rainy turf/Lightning) (17 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:07:14 -0500
   • Re: Fields (was rainy turf/Lightning) (63 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:05:55 -0500

7. Fields (was rainy turf/Lightning) (and some explaination)
   • Re: Fields (was rainy turf/Lightning) (and some explaination) (103 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:57:25 -0500

8. FIFA board - sin bin in Germany
   • Re: FIFA board - sin bin in Germany (36 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:58:38 -0500

9. FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs
   • FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (39 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:29:09 -0800
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (59 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:14:44 +0000
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (27 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:23:15 -0500
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (95 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:08 -0600
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (57 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:12:05 -0500
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (87 lines)
     From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:32:17 EST
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (79 lines)
     From: Ron <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:58:09 -0800
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (76 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:39:33 +0000
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (42 lines)
     From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:27:16 -0800
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (34 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:45:07 -0600
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (35 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:17:51 -0600
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (37 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:49:06 -0800
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (84 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:34:07 -0500
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (63 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:38:31 -0500
   • Re: FIFA board considers sin bins and more subs (38 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:47:19 -0500

10. He had somewhere to go
    • Re: He had somewhere to go (21 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:03:05 -0500

11. He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem???
    • He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (77 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:04:37 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (92 lines)
      From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:08:57 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (112 lines)
      From: Enrique Dentone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:23:37 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (127 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:17:15 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (105 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:28:17 +0000
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (13 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:58:23 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (42 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:54:35 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (23 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:03:12 -0600
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (27 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:55:44 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (45 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:00:45 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (53 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:55:03 -0600
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (70 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:44:39 -0600
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (89 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:57:17 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (21 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:23:31 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (24 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:25:39 -0500
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (26 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:56:02 -0800
    • Re: He had somewhere to go after the game????? (No score revealed) Or a hidden gem??? (46 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:14:28 -0800

12. Lightning (WAS Rainy Turf)
    • Lightning (WAS Rainy Turf) (158 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:52:53 -0600
    • Re: Lightning (WAS Rainy Turf) (235 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:19:59 -0600

13. Looking for Referees in South Bend, IN area
    • Looking for Referees in South Bend, IN area (48 lines)
      From: Mark Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:33:26 -0500

14. More Goal Celebrations
    • More Goal Celebrations (16 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:21:13 -0500
    • Re: More Goal Celebrations (25 lines)
      From: Wayne Pav <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:06:40 -0500

15. NF Online Test and State Variations
    • NF Online Test and State Variations (30 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:23:12 -0500
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (38 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:37:36 -0500
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (63 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:49:59 -0800
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (44 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:16:40 -0800
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (32 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:35:03 +0000
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (70 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:26:59 -0500
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (51 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:39:40 -0600
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (100 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:49:51 -0600
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (121 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:03:31 -0500
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (91 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:55:26 +0000
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (34 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:13:19 +0000
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (64 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:37:56 -0500
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (75 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:33:34 +0000

16. NF Online Test and State Variations ++
    • Re: NF Online Test and State Variations ++ (26 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:18:27 -0500

17. NFHS Goal celebration
    • NFHS Goal celebration (25 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:13:22 -0600
    • Re: NFHS Goal celebration (67 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:05:08 -0800
    • Re: NFHS Goal celebration (85 lines)
      From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:22:02 -0500

18. O/S - attempting to ? (was: RE: US Mex Red Card)
    • O/S - attempting to ? (was: RE: US Mex Red Card) (35 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:27:28 +0000
    • Re: O/S - attempting to ? (was: RE: US Mex Red Card) (58 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:00:20 -0800

19. October local soccer tournament follow-up
    • October local soccer tournament follow-up (54 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:47:09 -0500
    • Re: October local soccer tournament follow-up (26 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:03:15 -0800
    • Re: October local soccer tournament follow-up (32 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:36:42 -0800
    • Re: October local soccer tournament follow-up (46 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:53:16 -0600

20. Question from a ref quiz
    • Question from a ref quiz (28 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:37:17 -0800
    • Re: Question from a ref quiz (39 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:22:29 -0600
    • Re: Question from a ref quiz (46 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:23 -0800
    • Re: Question from a ref quiz (62 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:49:43 +0000
    • Re: Question from a ref quiz (37 lines)
      From: William Guynes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:16:08 -0500
    • Re: Question from a ref quiz (45 lines)
      From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:32:24 -0500
    • Re: Question from a ref quiz (68 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:41:37 -0600

21. Rainy Turf
    • Rainy Turf (28 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:22:43 -0800
    • Re: Rainy Turf (77 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:54:22 -0600
    • Re: Rainy Turf (21 lines)
      From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:09:09 -0500
    • Re: Rainy Turf (73 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:09:46 -0600
    • Re: Rainy Turf (43 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:46:39 -0500
    • Re: Rainy Turf (44 lines)
      From: Mark Mittelstadt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:17:57 -0500
    • Re: Rainy Turf (73 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:28:32 -0500
    • Re: Rainy Turf (124 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:18:58 -0500
    • Re: Rainy Turf (61 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:50:53 -0500

22. rainy turf
    • rainy turf (73 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:32:41 -0500

23. Rainy Turf
    • Re: Rainy Turf (36 lines)
      From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:06 -0500

24. Restart: Man U - West Ham
    • Restart: Man U - West Ham (16 lines)
      From: Thomas Coatoam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:41:48 -0500
    • Re: Restart: Man U - West Ham (34 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:18:42 -0600
    • Re: Restart: Man U - West Ham (25 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:13:55 -0500
    • Re: Restart: Man U - West Ham (26 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:04:31 -0600

25. sin bin
    • sin bin (62 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:58:04 -0500
    • Re: sin bin (46 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:32:56 -0600

26. Steve Bennett Reveals
    • Steve Bennett Reveals (32 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:23:25 -0800
    • Re: Steve Bennett Reveals (60 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:08:44 -0800
    • Re: Steve Bennett Reveals (21 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:55:43 -0600
    • Re: Steve Bennett Reveals (95 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:40:49 -0500

27. The Field : The Facts
    • The Field : The Facts (19 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:55:31 -0500
    • Re: The Field : The Facts (35 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:02:06 -0500

28. The Field : The Facts / Re: He had somewhere to go after the game
    • The Field : The Facts / Re: He had somewhere to go after the game (72 lines)
      From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:21:17 -0800
    • Re: The Field : The Facts / Re: He had somewhere to go after the game (100 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:03:33 -0500

29. US Mex Red Card
    • US Mex Red Card (30 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:01:59 -0500
    • Re: US Mex Red Card (37 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:42:47 -0500
    • Re: US Mex Red Card (62 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:44:08 -0500
    • Re: US Mex Red Card (25 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:34:02 -0500
    • Re: US Mex Red Card (22 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:33:19 -0800
    • Re: US Mex Red Card (25 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:15:59 -0500
    • Re: US Mex Red Card (37 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:08 -0800

30. USSF Nationals and Statistics. Was NF Online Test and State Variations
    • USSF Nationals and Statistics. Was NF Online Test and State Variations (122 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:46:48 -0800

31. What If? Why Not?
    • What If? Why Not? (107 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:12:11 -0500
    • Re: What If? Why Not? (143 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:52:53 -0500
    • Re: What If? Why Not? (47 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:18:59 -0500
    • Re: What If? Why Not? (34 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:28:26 -0800

32. When players also are referees
    • When players also are referees (37 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:55:38 -0800
    • Re: When players also are referees (61 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:08:42 -0600
    • Re: When players also are referees (79 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:07:18 -0800
    • Re: When players also are referees (49 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:38:03 -0500
    • Re: When players also are referees (69 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:16:02 -0500
    • Re: When players also are referees (52 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:46:10 -0800

33. [UBE?] RAINY TURF
    • [UBE?] RAINY TURF (79 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:21:45 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] RAINY TURF (92 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:40:21 -0800

34. [UBE?] Re: NF Online Test and State Variations
    • [UBE?] Re: NF Online Test and State Variations (28 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:54:11 -0500