SOCREF-L Archives – March 2009, week 4

1. (non-ref; tangentially soccer) IPL may go to SA
   • (non-ref; tangentially soccer) IPL may go to SA (30 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:13:32 -0700
   • Re: (non-ref; tangentially soccer) IPL may go to SA (26 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:36:58 -0400
   • Re: (non-ref; tangentially soccer) IPL may go to SA (38 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:48:32 +0000
   • Re: (non-ref; tangentially soccer) IPL may go to SA (38 lines)
     From: Mark Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:53:15 +1100
   • Re: (non-ref; tangentially soccer) IPL may go to SA (36 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:15:46 -0700

2. AR position for Throw-in
   • Re: AR position for Throw-in (28 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:41:20 -0700
   • Re: AR position for Throw-in (26 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:57:45 -0400
   • Re: AR position for Throw-in (47 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:00:32 -0500
   • Re: AR position for Throw-in (80 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:48:34 -0700
   • Re: AR position for Throw-in (81 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:36:12 -0700

3. Change of Kickers on PK
   • Change of Kickers on PK (20 lines)
     From: Moto REF <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:59:28 -0700
   • Re: Change of Kickers on PK (40 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:10:20 -0400
   • Re: Change of Kickers on PK (27 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:10:43 -0400
   • Re: Change of Kickers on PK (38 lines)
     From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:15:31 +0000
   • Re: Change of Kickers on PK (46 lines)
     From: Craig & Maggie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:08:37 -0500
   • Re: Change of Kickers on PK (45 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:17:21 -0400

4. FA is Friedel's Friend
   • FA is Friedel's Friend (41 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:21:39 -0700
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (76 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:57:06 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (92 lines)
     From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:43:29 -0700
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (42 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:55:02 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (113 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:26:23 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (139 lines)
     From: Richard Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:58:33 -0600
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (162 lines)
     From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:19:05 -0700
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (171 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:16:29 -0500
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (231 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:00:15 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (145 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:31:51 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (189 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:16:49 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (185 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:58:59 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (209 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:02:14 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (36 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:35:41 -0400
   • Re: FA is Friedel's Friend (49 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:56:01 -0700

5. Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer)
   • Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (21 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:48:25 -0500
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (28 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:56:52 -0400
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (25 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:08:45 -0400
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (35 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:10:51 -0400
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (40 lines)
     From: Spencer Ford <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:49:57 -0400
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (53 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:13:36 -0500
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (51 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:32:08 -0400
   • Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (27 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:49:53 -0400

6. High school basketball team assessed technical foul for illegal uniforms, lose playoff game by 1 point
   • High school basketball team assessed technical foul for illegal uniforms, lose playoff game by 1 point (24 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:32:00 -0700
   • Re: High school basketball team assessed technical foul for illegal uniforms, lose playoff game by 1 point (56 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:06:55 -0700

7. High school basketball team assessed technical foul for illegal uniforms, lose playoff game by 1 point (2)
   • High school basketball team assessed technical foul for illegal uniforms, lose playoff game by 1 point (2) (78 lines)
     From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:02:30 -0700
   • Re: High school basketball team assessed technical foul for illegal uniforms, lose playoff game by 1 point (2) (95 lines)
     From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:05:59 -0700

8. High School vs FIFA
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (56 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:21:57 -0400
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (25 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:35:08 -0700
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (33 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:57:39 -0400
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (71 lines)
     From: Spencer Ford <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:05:35 -0400
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (101 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:00:36 +0000
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (108 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:48:01 -0500
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (125 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:27:22 -0700
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (148 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0500
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (202 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:57:30 -0700
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (28 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:02:14 -0700

9. High School vs FIFA (while the Ball is in play)
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (while the Ball is in play) (97 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:49:30 -0400
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (while the Ball is in play) (28 lines)
     From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:06:27 -0500
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (while the Ball is in play) (128 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:34:30 -0500
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (while the Ball is in play) (31 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:38:52 -0700
   • Re: High School vs FIFA (while the Ball is in play) (121 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:07:35 +0000

10. High school vs. FIFA
    • High school vs. FIFA (33 lines)
      From: Spencer Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:36:12 -0400
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (72 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:16:45 -0400
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (42 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:25:46 -0400
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (46 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:49:58 -0700
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (52 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:53:04 -0700
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (48 lines)
      From: Doug Epps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:34:34 -0500
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (93 lines)
      From: Spencer Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:06:40 -0400
    • Re: High school vs. FIFA (61 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:38:38 -0700

11. High Winds
    • High Winds (21 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:55:04 -0700
    • Re: High Winds (67 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:19:53 +0000
    • Re: High Winds (87 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:24:50 -0700
    • Re: High Winds (121 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:56:34 EDT
    • Re: High Winds (69 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:21:48 -0500
    • Re: High Winds (87 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:39:38 -0500

12. How to remain an international referee after age 45
    • How to remain an international referee after age 45 (17 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:39:20 -0700

13. Interesting PK
    • Interesting PK (47 lines)
      From: b bode <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:20:17 -0500
    • Re: Interesting PK (60 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:04:51 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (67 lines)
      From: Scott Sawyer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:27:35 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (96 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:07:55 -0400
    • Re: Interesting PK (67 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:48:36 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (52 lines)
      From: Doug Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:51:08 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (66 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:57:26 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (94 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:05:32 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (69 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:11:02 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (83 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:21:34 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (22 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:11:13 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (84 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:48:40 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (80 lines)
      From: Stephen Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:56:41 +1100
    • Re: Interesting PK (106 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:49:45 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (113 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:53:54 -0600
    • Re: Interesting PK (62 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:04:35 -0600
    • Re: Interesting PK (37 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:49:38 -0500
    • Re: Interesting PK (50 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:05:00 -0500
    • Re: Interesting PK (21 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:13:17 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (39 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:36:40 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (45 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:27:39 -0500
    • Re: Interesting PK (25 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:55:48 -0500
    • Re: Interesting PK (54 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:06:55 -0500
    • Re: Interesting PK (78 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:26:35 +0000
    • Re: Interesting PK (55 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:35:45 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (101 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:40:23 -0700
    • Re: Interesting PK (66 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:24:58 -0700

14. Interfering with Play - USSF video and Position Paper
    • Interfering with Play - USSF video and Position Paper (107 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:54:29 -0500
    • Re: Interfering with Play - USSF video and Position Paper (147 lines)
      From: Richard Houser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:41:03 -0800
    • Re: Interfering with Play - USSF video and Position Paper (41 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:37:37 -0500
    • Re: Interfering with Play - USSF video and Position Paper (22 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:08:00 -0500
    • Re: Interfering with Play - USSF video and Position Paper (117 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:27:36 +0000

15. Keeper Jersey of Saudi Arabia vs Iran
    • Keeper Jersey of Saudi Arabia vs Iran (22 lines)
      From: James Thomson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:53:34 -0500
    • Re: Keeper Jersey of Saudi Arabia vs Iran (40 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:25:34 -0700
    • Re: Keeper Jersey of Saudi Arabia vs Iran (40 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:53:01 -0500

16. Learning the LOTG
    • Learning the LOTG (31 lines)
      From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:22:57 -0400

17. Misconduct after whistle for penalty kick
    • Misconduct after whistle for penalty kick (93 lines)
      From: Scott Sawyer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:30:24 -0700
    • Re: Misconduct after whistle for penalty kick (27 lines)
      From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:01:49 -0400
    • Re: Misconduct after whistle for penalty kick (52 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:49:35 -0700

18. Misconduct By A Player Off The Field of Play
    • Misconduct By A Player Off The Field of Play (81 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:50:02 -0700
    • Re: Misconduct By A Player Off The Field of Play (171 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:26:52 +0000
    • Re: Misconduct By A Player Off The Field of Play (81 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:41:49 -0700
    • Re: Misconduct By A Player Off The Field of Play (32 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:53:45 -0400
    • Re: Misconduct By A Player Off The Field of Play (62 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:14:41 +0000

19. NFHS KFTPM (Was: High School vs FIFA)
    • NFHS KFTPM (Was: High School vs FIFA) (50 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:12:58 -0500

20. Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams
    • Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (24 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:14:47 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (41 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:24:07 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (51 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:29:49 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (40 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:33:22 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (26 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:39:16 -0500
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (39 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:50:36 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (48 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:00:23 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (64 lines)
      From: Michael Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:08:14 -0500
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (60 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:20:48 -0500
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (48 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:35:15 -0400
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (21 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:55:14 -0700
    • Re: Refereeing scrimmages between sanctioned teams (83 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:55:06 -0400

21. Throw-in differences
    • Throw-in differences (71 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:18:30 -0400
    • Re: Throw-in differences (86 lines)
      From: Richard Houser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:49:28 -0800

22. US Soccer Guidance For Officials
    • US Soccer Guidance For Officials (39 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:56:21 -0700

23. USSF Throw-in Teaser
    • USSF Throw-in Teaser (24 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:09:51 -0500
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (36 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:14:54 -0400
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (41 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:24:45 -0700
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (59 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:06:30 -0400
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (33 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:19:09 -0700
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (39 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:20:08 -0500
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (41 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:06:43 -0500
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (57 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:18:12 -0500
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (57 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:37:27 -0400
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (48 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:53:58 -0700
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (47 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:02:55 -0400
    • Re: USSF Throw-in Teaser (69 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:08:10 -0400

24. Videotaping yourself during a match
    • Videotaping yourself during a match (23 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:53:32 -0700
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (37 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:16:30 -0500
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (53 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:51:14 -0500
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (43 lines)
      From: Dave Young <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:38:03 -0400
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (64 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:21:01 -0700
    • Videotaping yourself during a match (34 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:40:08 -0400
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (40 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:41:09 -0700
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (47 lines)
      From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:07:53 -0700
    • Re: Videotaping yourself during a match (58 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:27:53 -0500

25. What if the assessor gets it wrong?
    • What if the assessor gets it wrong? (52 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:30:22 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (71 lines)
      From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:49:08 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (93 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:45:30 -0500
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (74 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:17:18 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (43 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:49:34 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (72 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:11:39 -0500
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (108 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:07:53 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (90 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:41:52 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (87 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:55:17 +0000
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (128 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:44:56 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (190 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:36:48 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (37 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:03:40 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (20 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:06:11 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (37 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:54:33 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (97 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:34:38 +0000
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (119 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:56:20 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (187 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:32:15 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (461 lines)
      From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:25:27 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (498 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:32:22 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (521 lines)
      From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:06:03 -0700
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (59 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:47:34 -0400
    • Re: What if the assessor gets it wrong? (28 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:07:43 -0400

26. [UBE?] Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer)
    • [UBE?] Re: Filed Hockey Refereeing (Non-soccer) (27 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:47:03 EDT

27. [UBE?] Re: Interesting PK
    • [UBE?] Re: Interesting PK (81 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:06:30 -0400