SOCREF-L Archives – May 2009, week 3

1. Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP
   • Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (38 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:50:21 -0500
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (55 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:13:06 -0700
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (89 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:52:58 -0400
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (62 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:07:19 -0500
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (53 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:40:55 -0400
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (36 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:55:48 -0500
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (62 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:57:30 -0500
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (56 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:05:44 -0500
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (21 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:16:47 -0400
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (28 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:36:24 -0500
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (30 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:07:06 -0400
   • Re: Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (25 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:33:46 -0400
   • Caution for Trickery (UB) or Leaving the FOP (51 lines)
     From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:04:23 -0400

2. DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct?
   • DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (35 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:41:23 -0500
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (15 lines)
     From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:59:44 -0400
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (55 lines)
     From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:03:22 -0700
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (42 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:09:07 -0700
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (55 lines)
     From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:05:07 -0400
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (59 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:21:10 -0700
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (78 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:32:40 -0500
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (67 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:22:12 +0000
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (24 lines)
     From: ced53 <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:40:01 -0700
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (52 lines)
     From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:21:02 -0700
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (31 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:07:58 -0400
   • Re: DFK becomes IFK because of Misconduct? (31 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 06:58:12 -0400

3. IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already
   • Re: IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already (59 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:44:47 -0500
   • Re: IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already (49 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:40:23 +0000
   • Re: IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already (23 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:57:55 -0700
   • Re: IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already (53 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:12:02 -0400
   • Re: IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already (38 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:38:50 -0700
   • Re: IFK encroachment vs. ball in play already (95 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:46:44 -0500

4. Immediate or delayed caution?
   • Immediate or delayed caution? (42 lines)
     From: Kevin Walter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:01:48 -0500
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (37 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:04:52 -0400
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (63 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:06:50 -0700
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (59 lines)
     From: Doug Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:39:34 -0700
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (82 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 23:08:42 -0400
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (96 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:39:56 -0500
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (125 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 21:34:55 -0700
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (58 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:08:26 -0400
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (37 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:40:44 -0500
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (57 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:44:19 -0700
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (95 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:51:47 -0400
   • Re: Immediate or delayed caution? (48 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:42:31 -0500

5. Leaving the field or the game (was Re: Caution for ...)
   • Leaving the field or the game (was Re: Caution for ...) (63 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 16:49:28 -0400

6. Leaving the FOP-cps
   • Re: Leaving the FOP-cps (87 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:40:46 -0400
   • Re: Leaving the FOP-cps (39 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:20:42 -0400
   • Re: Leaving the FOP-cps (57 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:24:00 -0500
   • Re: Leaving the FOP-cps (70 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:08:45 -0700
   • Re: Leaving the FOP-cps (88 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 17:54:21 -0400
   • Re: Leaving the FOP-cps (74 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 18:32:29 -0400

7. MLS - Garber - The Commissioner Speaks: May 19
   • MLS - Garber - The Commissioner Speaks: May 19 (26 lines)
     From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:03:37 -0400

8. Player off the field w/o permission
   • Re: Player off the field w/o permission (62 lines)
     From: Derek - AYSO West Los Angeles <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:07:42 -0400

9. Remembering Avraham Klein
   • Remembering Avraham Klein (90 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:42:39 -0700
   • Re: Remembering Avraham Klein (99 lines)
     From: Shelly Landry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:41:40 -0400

10. Seven minus a Few equals Less
    • Seven minus a Few equals Less (120 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:21:00 -0400

11. the soccer project
    • the soccer project (36 lines)
      From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:32:08 -0700
    • Re: the soccer project (45 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:35:04 -0500

12. Tournaments Labor Day Weekend
    • Re: Tournaments Labor Day Weekend (26 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:55:35 -0400

13. What is the proper way to handle this?
    • Re: What is the proper way to handle this? (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:49:54 -0400

14. Words: Chivas USA vs DC United
    • Words: Chivas USA vs DC United (25 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 20:46:03 -0700
    • Re: Words: Chivas USA vs DC United (27 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 23:17:50 -0500

15. yeah, but who were the referees...
    • yeah, but who were the referees... (20 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:13:41 -0700
    • Re: yeah, but who were the referees... (36 lines)
      From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:02:01 -0700