SOCREF-L Archives – May 2009, week 4

1. Background on Champions League Final referee
   • Background on Champions League Final referee (38 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:47:42 -0400

2. coaching assessors
   • coaching assessors (46 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:42:24 -0700
   • Re: coaching assessors (26 lines)
     From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:58:07 -0400
   • Re: coaching assessors (55 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:30:16 -0400

3. Especially not if it's Tommy Smythe (Humor, no substance)
   • Especially not if it's Tommy Smythe (Humor, no substance) (19 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:48:39 -0400

4. FS: Refscall Electronic Flags
   • FS: Refscall Electronic Flags (28 lines)
     From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:30:27 -0700

5. Good ol' Andy Capp
   • Good ol' Andy Capp (17 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:36:31 -0500
   • Re: Good ol' Andy Capp (35 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:39:42 -0700

6. level of officiating article
   • level of officiating article (33 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:04:22 -0700
   • Re: level of officiating article (52 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:16:03 -0700
   • Re: level of officiating article (60 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:03:19 +0000
   • Re: level of officiating article (24 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:16:33 -0400
   • Re: level of officiating article (37 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:18:19 -0700
   • Re: level of officiating article (84 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:56:15 -0400
   • Re: level of officiating article (65 lines)
     From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:00:59 -0500
   • Re: level of officiating article (60 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:33:36 -0700
   • Re: level of officiating article (76 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:32:52 -0700
   • Re: level of officiating article (128 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:30:57 -0700
   • Re: level of officiating article (199 lines)
     From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:56:44 EDT
   • Re: level of officiating article (63 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:04:52 +0000
   • Re: level of officiating article (58 lines)
     From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:36:30 -0700

7. level of officiating article-cps
   • Re: level of officiating article-cps (97 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:30:43 -0400

8. Offside Player Challenges for Ball
   • Offside Player Challenges for Ball (25 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:48:06 -0400
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (39 lines)
     From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:56:02 -0400
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (35 lines)
     From: Joshua Boylan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:00:33 -0400
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (44 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:58:37 -0500
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (83 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:50:28 -0400
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (54 lines)
     From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:30:46 -0500
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (78 lines)
     From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:16:30 -0400
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (36 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:25:40 -0700
   • Re: Offside Player Challenges for Ball (30 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:31:38 -0400

9. Offside ruling from Jim Allen
   • Offside ruling from Jim Allen (27 lines)
     From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:06:59 -0500

10. Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (36 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:14:46 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (52 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 23:28:39 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (69 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 20:57:45 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (73 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:48:36 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (22 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:21:40 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (99 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 01:28:30 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (115 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 00:40:45 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (17 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:56:32 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (123 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 01:29:06 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (36 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:01:59 +0000
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (51 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:03:43 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (93 lines)
      From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:44:08 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (119 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:42:15 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (63 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:28:37 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (115 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:36:18 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (127 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:15:49 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (130 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 03:54:47 +0000
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (140 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 21:23:16 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (32 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 06:40:21 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (25 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:46:24 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (31 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:51:32 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (96 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:25:42 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (130 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:37:36 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (46 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:28:11 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (21 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:57:08 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (52 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:38:39 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (107 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:07:04 +0000
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (65 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:00:25 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (17 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:11:39 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (58 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:17:54 -0500
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (69 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:07:21 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (95 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:40:17 -0700
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (78 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:24:04 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (124 lines)
      From: Mark Mittelstadt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:04:13 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (128 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:46:01 -0400
    • Re: Offside ruling from Jim Allen -- address link added (188 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:52:23 -0400

11. Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...)
    • Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (82 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:28:25 +0000
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (62 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:36:35 -0400
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (56 lines)
      From: Donn Milton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:51:14 -0500
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (75 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:35:47 -0400
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (81 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:42:57 -0400
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (137 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:44:18 +0000
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (62 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:57:17 +0000
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (47 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:04:54 -0400
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (45 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:17:47 -0400
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (74 lines)
      From: Donn Milton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:56:59 -0500
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (96 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:41:12 -0700
    • Re: Restart after card delayed by advantage (Was RE: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The...) (80 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:55:41 -0700

12. UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at (86 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:22:48 -0400
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at (126 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:36:57 -0400
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at (38 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:18:30 -0400
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at (38 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:17:10 -0700

13. UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at to...
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at to... (148 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:23:48 EDT

14. UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level!
    • UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level! (66 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:12:36 -0400
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level! (75 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:42:30 -0700
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level! (108 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 22:59:25 -0700
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level! (31 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:51:10 -0400
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level! (52 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:11:00 -0700
    • Re: UCL final -- no score revealed -- The game is NOT refereed the same at top level! (24 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:12:28 -0400