SOCREF-L Archives – September 2009, week 1

1. Additional Assistant Referees
   • Re: Additional Assistant Referees (33 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:21:05 -0700

2. Another Lightning related story....
   • Another Lightning related story.... (17 lines)
     From: Derek - AYSO West Los Angeles <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:14:36 -0400

3. argentina v brazil
   • argentina v brazil (18 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:10:17 -0700
   • Re: argentina v brazil (29 lines)
     From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:18:30 +0000

4. England vs. Slovenia-non call (correction)
   • Re: England vs. Slovenia-non call (correction) (32 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:35:26 -0700

5. England vs. Sweden-non call
   • England vs. Sweden-non call (23 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:19:01 -0700
   • Re: England vs. Sweden-non call (21 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:27:51 -0400

6. FW: No spray for this one
   • FW: No spray for this one (86 lines)
     From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:57:39 -0500

7. Holding the whistle
   • Holding the whistle (15 lines)
     From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:34:40 -0400
   • Re: Holding the whistle (28 lines)
     From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:27:37 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (40 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:48:40 -0500
   • Re: Holding the whistle (38 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:58:35 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (43 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:13:34 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (54 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:11:19 +0000
   • Re: Holding the whistle (63 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:23:29 -0400
   • Re: Holding the whistle (37 lines)
     From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:01:17 -0400
   • Re: Holding the whistle (36 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:06:51 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (39 lines)
     From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:07:02 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (26 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:42:14 -0500
   • Re: Holding the whistle (56 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:50:59 -0400
   • Re: Holding the whistle (65 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 22:59:50 +0000
   • Re: Holding the whistle (81 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:04:58 -0500
   • Re: Holding the whistle (38 lines)
     From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:10:51 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (33 lines)
     From: WSARA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 22:15:38 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (27 lines)
     From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 21:59:46 -0400
   • Re: Holding the whistle (34 lines)
     From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:30:04 -0700
   • Re: Holding the whistle (35 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:57 -0500

8. Humorous Goal Celebrations
   • Humorous Goal Celebrations (14 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:11:28 -0400

9. Intercepted Communication
   • Intercepted Communication (37 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:40:48 -0700
   • Re: Intercepted Communication (68 lines)
     From: Larry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:27:05 -0500
   • Re: Intercepted Communication (78 lines)
     From: Gary Sawyer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:45:37 +0000
   • Re: Intercepted Communication (91 lines)
     From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:51:04 +0000

10. Is this old school? Or am I missing something?
    • Re: Is this old school? Or am I missing something? (37 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:55:13 -0400

11. Mex v. CR drop ball [no score]
    • Mex v. CR drop ball [no score] (23 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:34:52 -0400

12. NFL bans refs from social media
    • NFL bans refs from social media (33 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:24:49 -0500
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (46 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:10:41 -0700
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (68 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 07:46:24 -0700
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (71 lines)
      From: John Magnusson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:19:26 +0200
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (89 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:16:30 -0700
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (104 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:36:25 +0000
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (109 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:37:50 -0700
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (25 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:47:57 -0400
    • Re: NFL bans refs from social media (41 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:24 -0500

13. No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink
    • No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (59 lines)
      From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:02:57 -0700
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (92 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:37:25 -0700
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (33 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:06:37 +0000
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (98 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 06:28:25 -0500
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (15 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:48:17 -0400
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (87 lines)
      From: Jorge L. Gimeno <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:02:02 -0700
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (18 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:53:24 -0400
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (137 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:23:46 -0400
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (22 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:11:10 -0700
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (36 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:12:31 -0500
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (37 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:39:19 +0000
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (26 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:25:10 -0500
    • Re: No offside "directly" from a throw-in - a slight kink (33 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:58:06 +0000

14. No spray for this one
    • No spray for this one (23 lines)
      From: Kevin Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:35:04 -0600
    • Re: No spray for this one (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:55:52 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (43 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:12:05 EDT
    • Re: No spray for this one (41 lines)
      From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:19:24 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (52 lines)
      From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:23:07 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (43 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:22:58 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (65 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:23:05 -0700
    • Re: No spray for this one (57 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:28:38 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (62 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:18:31 -0500
    • Re: No spray for this one (55 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:09:39 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (65 lines)
      From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:34:31 -0700
    • Re: No spray for this one (68 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:31:00 -0700
    • Re: No spray for this one (79 lines)
      From: Kyle Himsl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:37:05 +0000
    • Re: No spray for this one (42 lines)
      From: Jim Dyer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:14:41 -0400
    • Re: No spray for this one (59 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:18:14 -0700

15. Offside or Throw In
    • Offside or Throw In (31 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:24:36 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (49 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:30:50 -0500
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (45 lines)
      From: Dave Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:37:17 -0500
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (28 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:43:52 -0400
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (52 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:51:55 -0500
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (22 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:53:46 -0500
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (42 lines)
      From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:41:05 -0400
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (27 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:03:27 -0400
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (43 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:02:05 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (59 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:04:53 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (71 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:18:12 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (109 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:31:35 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (123 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:47:50 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (123 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:47:05 -0700
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (123 lines)
      From: Dave Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:48:12 -0500
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (121 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:52:25 -0400
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:04:55 -0400
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (139 lines)
      From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:03:18 -0400
    • Re: Offside or Throw In (163 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:58:26 -0700

16. Pro Soccer Referees Association
    • Pro Soccer Referees Association (30 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:22:00 -0400

17. Redesigned USSF website -- week in review
    • Re: Redesigned USSF website -- week in review (20 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:37:18 -0400
    • Re: Redesigned USSF website -- week in review (30 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:57:34 -0700
    • Re: Redesigned USSF website -- week in review (39 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 20:00:23 -0700

18. Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness
    • Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness (30 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:28:26 -0400
    • Re: Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness (54 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:52:39 -0700
    • Re: Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness (47 lines)
      From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:38:25 -0700
    • Re: Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness (55 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:08:45 -0400
    • Re: Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness (15 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:50:20 -0400
    • Re: Taking Ibuprofen intended to reduce muscle soreness (35 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:22:10 -0400

19. Talking to the coach
    • Re: Talking to the coach (134 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:11:21 -0700

20. Talking to the coach (was: Do we really see what ...)
    • Re: Talking to the coach (was: Do we really see what ...) (36 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:22:57 -0700
    • Re: Talking to the coach (was: Do we really see what ...) (56 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:57:08 +0000
    • Re: Talking to the coach (was: Do we really see what ...) (41 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:15:57 -0400

21. Tickets for Oct 14 USA-Costa Rica
    • Tickets for Oct 14 USA-Costa Rica (20 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:55:06 -0400

22. Uniform Care
    • Re: Uniform Care (42 lines)
      From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:20:30 -0700

23. US - SLV
    • US - SLV (12 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:12:17 +0000

24. US v. ES (implication of score)
    • US v. ES (implication of score) (14 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 22:16:22 -0400
    • Re: US v. ES (implication of score) (25 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:22:09 +0000
    • Re: US v. ES (implication of score) (19 lines)
      From: laurent thomas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:21:43 -0700
    • Re: US v. ES (implication of score) (30 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:31:37 +0000
    • Re: US v. ES (implication of score) (62 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 03:10:02 +0000
    • Re: US v. ES (implication of score) (40 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:45:40 -0400

25. Very specific photos asked for
    • Very specific photos asked for (31 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:58:20 -0400

26. What is with these numbers?
    • What is with these numbers? (46 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:06:00 -0400
    • Re: What is with these numbers? (40 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:28:44 -0500
    • Re: What is with these numbers? (19 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:26:43 -0400
    • Re: What is with these numbers? (35 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:55:55 +0000

27. What's Up With All the Acronyms?!
    • What's Up With All the Acronyms?! (84 lines)
      From: Foerster Michael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:51:32 -0400
    • Re: What's Up With All the Acronyms?! (96 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:58:17 +0000
    • Re: What's Up With All the Acronyms?! (23 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:10:31 -0500
    • Re: What's Up With All the Acronyms?! (101 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:14:54 -0500
    • Re: What's Up With All the Acronyms?! (99 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:22:17 -0700

28. When did the fair go out of play?
    • When did the fair go out of play? (19 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:58:32 -0700

29. Who is the Bigger Bonehead?
    • Who is the Bigger Bonehead? (26 lines)
      From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:17:56 -0400

30. Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules?
    • Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (29 lines)
      From: Ron Tremper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:20:49 +0000
    • Re: Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (63 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:45:33 -0400
    • Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (46 lines)
      From: Ron Tremper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:06:35 +0000
    • Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (138 lines)
      From: Jevan Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:23:56 -0400
    • Re: Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (152 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:47:30 -0700
    • Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (27 lines)
      From: Jevan Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:13:29 EDT
    • Re: Whose game is it? Whose federation is it? League rules? (154 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:03:16 -0400

31. Wick and Prus
    • Wick and Prus (19 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:59:18 -0700
    • Re: Wick and Prus (15 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:34:41 -0400