SOCREF-L Archives – September 2009, week 4

1. cheating
   • cheating (13 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:03:26 -0700
   • Re: cheating (20 lines)
     From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:07:40 -0700
   • Re: cheating (23 lines)
     From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:09:33 -0700
   • Re: cheating (55 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:45:46 -0500
   • Re: cheating (30 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:53:42 -0400
   • Re: cheating (15 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:53:58 -0500
   • Re: cheating (25 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:59:47 -0700
   • Re: cheating (55 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:24:40 -0400
   • Re: cheating (74 lines)
     From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:27:58 -0700
   • Re: cheating (32 lines)
     From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:19:59 -0400
   • Re: cheating (41 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:30:55 -0500
   • Re: cheating (26 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:00:16 -0500

2. Chelsea - Porto
   • Chelsea - Porto (17 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:06:04 -0500

3. Do not signal obvious throw-ins.
   • Re: Do not signal obvious throw-ins. (112 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:58:55 -0400

4. DOGSO-H
   • DOGSO-H (18 lines)
     From: Simon Guenzl <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:06:34 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:55:54 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (41 lines)
     From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:05:15 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (48 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:44:31 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (88 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:16:33 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (95 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:42:48 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (96 lines)
     From: Simon Guenzl <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:07:41 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (122 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:42:48 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (153 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:52:17 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (45 lines)
     From: Dennis Shimer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:06:14 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (174 lines)
     From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:43:15 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (179 lines)
     From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:48:09 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (28 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:55:20 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (66 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:24:37 +0000

5. DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph)
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (50 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:54:59 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (71 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:38:51 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (100 lines)
     From: Michael McCarthy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:09:55 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (93 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:26:59 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (118 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:32:35 -0700
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (122 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:33:26 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (130 lines)
     From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:26:31 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (52 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:37:31 -0400
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (143 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:02:07 +0000
   • Re: DOGSO-H (correcting my garbled 2nd paragraph) (85 lines)
     From: Simon Guenzl <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:06:49 -0400

6. Download link for 2009 USSF Advice to Referees
   • Download link for 2009 USSF Advice to Referees (29 lines)
     From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:59:10 -0400

7. High School Soccer Uniforms
   • High School Soccer Uniforms (83 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:46:13 -0400
   • Re: High School Soccer Uniforms (119 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:16:57 -0700
   • Re: High School Soccer Uniforms (58 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:39:44 -0400
   • Re: High School Soccer Uniforms (115 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:43:31 -0400
   • Re: High School Soccer Uniforms (140 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:33:16 -0400

8. If you gotta go ....
   • If you gotta go .... (15 lines)
     From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:16:49 -0400

9. Interesting Penalty take
   • Interesting Penalty take (15 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:42:33 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Penalty take (16 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:43:21 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Penalty take (31 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:11:58 -0700
   • Re: Interesting Penalty take (27 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:11:56 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Penalty take (35 lines)
     From: Mark Mittelstadt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:57:24 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Penalty take (43 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:15:52 -0400
   • Re: Interesting Penalty take (35 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:26:40 -0400

10. Is the foot offside?
    • Is the foot offside? (43 lines)
      From: Greg Hise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:18:53 -0500
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (52 lines)
      From: Dennis Shimer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:34:51 -0400
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (36 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:43:07 -0700
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (75 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:48:42 -0700
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (69 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:48:48 -0500
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (48 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:56:00 -0400
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (41 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:32:48 -0700
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (60 lines)
      From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:07:22 -0700
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (67 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:34:08 -0400
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (60 lines)
      From: Ian Tooze <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:18:50 -0700
    • Re: Is the foot offside? (97 lines)
      From: Greg Hise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:03:00 -0500

11. Leeds v Liverpool - Spirit of the Game, Goal or No Goal
    • Leeds v Liverpool - Spirit of the Game, Goal or No Goal (40 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:50:09 -0400
    • Re: Leeds v Liverpool - Spirit of the Game, Goal or No Goal (42 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:23:00 -0700

12. MLS Procedure for AR called foul in PA
    • MLS Procedure for AR called foul in PA (84 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:57:24 -0400
    • Re: MLS Procedure for AR called foul in PA (85 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:02:04 -0400
    • Re: MLS Procedure for AR called foul in PA (43 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:12:31 -0700
    • Re: MLS Procedure for AR called foul in PA (126 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:45:20 -0400

13. Off Side Errors
    • Off Side Errors (37 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:21:45 -0700
    • Re: Off Side Errors (33 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:35:30 -0700
    • Re: Off Side Errors (32 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:44:02 -0700
    • Re: Off Side Errors (64 lines)
      From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:43:32 -0400
    • Re: Off Side Errors (96 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:54:04 -0700

14. Offside or not?
    • Offside or not? (40 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:38:35 -0400
    • Re: Offside or not? (62 lines)
      From: Morten Mikkelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:01:44 -0400
    • Re: Offside or not? (53 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:08:14 -0400

15. Playable Pitch
    • Playable Pitch (19 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:01:34 -0400

16. Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup)
    • Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (13 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:39:24 -0400
    • Re: Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (22 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:48:56 -0400
    • Re: Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (45 lines)
      From: Ken Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:49:56 -0400
    • Re: Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (57 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:05:00 -0700
    • Re: Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (31 lines)
      From: Steve Meyers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:26:59 -0400
    • Re: Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (38 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:50:05 -0500
    • Re: Red Card - Man U (Carling Cup) (49 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:18:36 -0400

17. Ref60 web site
    • Ref60 web site (46 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:47:41 -0400
    • Re: Ref60 web site (25 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:23:08 -0400
    • Re: Ref60 web site (39 lines)
      From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:00:28 -0700

18. SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS
    • SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (74 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:52:49 -0700
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (44 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:32:50 -0400
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (53 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:10:03 -0700
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (76 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:52:18 -0400
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (129 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:25:20 -0700
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (60 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:59:09 -0700
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (38 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:07:25 -0400
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (68 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:37:12 -0700
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (85 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:28:18 -0500

19. Skipper returns from the missing (Was: Interesting Penalty take)
    • Skipper returns from the missing (Was: Interesting Penalty take) (64 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:36:34 -0400
    • Re: Skipper returns from the missing (Was: Interesting Penalty take) (76 lines)
      From: Mark Mittelstadt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:01:45 -0400

20. When to overrule an offside flag (Was: Is the foot offside?)
    • Re: When to overrule an offside flag (Was: Is the foot offside?) (115 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:34:40 -0700
    • Re: When to overrule an offside flag (Was: Is the foot offside?) (44 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:42:33 -0500
    • Re: When to overrule an offside flag (Was: Is the foot offside?) (34 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:52:47 -0700
    • Re: When to overrule an offside flag (Was: Is the foot offside?) (21 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:49:58 -0500
    • Re: When to overrule an offside flag (Was: Is the foot offside?) (28 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:15:41 -0500