SOCREF-L Archives – October 2009, week 1

1. adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?)
   • adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (44 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:56:02 +0000
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (62 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:36:00 -0700
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (65 lines)
     From: Steve Meyers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:36:14 -0400
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (75 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:41:01 -0400
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (88 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:03:36 -0700
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (90 lines)
     From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:17:34 -0700
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (101 lines)
     From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:46:58 -0700
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (110 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:24:39 -0700
   • Re: adding time (Was: RE: End of game, yes or no?) (133 lines)
     From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:48:31 -0700

2. Andy Capp ref comic strip
   • Andy Capp ref comic strip (16 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:59:20 -0400
   • Re: Andy Capp ref comic strip (13 lines)
     From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:21:32 -0400

3. Coach's behavior
   • Coach's behavior (31 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:17:59 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (45 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:39:30 -0400
   • Re: Coach's behavior (82 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:52:24 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (130 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:27:14 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (166 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:12:59 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (155 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:05:59 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (63 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:40:32 -0400
   • Re: Coach's behavior (102 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:25:14 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (68 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:29:39 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:20:45 -0400
   • Re: Coach's behavior (48 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:41:41 -0400
   • Re: Coach's behavior (78 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:10:37 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (148 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:51:08 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (101 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:10:23 -0700
   • Re: Coach's behavior (45 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:13:21 -0700

4. Contacts in FL
   • Contacts in FL (16 lines)
     From: Bob Chappuis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:01:13 -0400

5. End of game, yes or no?
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (60 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:13:06 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (39 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:31:04 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (35 lines)
     From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:00:09 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (42 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:18:43 -0500
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (42 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:02:17 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (58 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:17:35 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (67 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:09:34 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (65 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:14:41 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (80 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:27:17 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (101 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:02:29 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (111 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:10:18 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (28 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:12:34 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (143 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:18:01 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (36 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:23:46 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (20 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:50:35 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (119 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:52:40 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (72 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:49:41 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (32 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:57:06 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (131 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:01:55 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (40 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:03:58 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (143 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:54:32 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (177 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:43:46 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (27 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:50:30 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (187 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:03:35 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (49 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:32:49 +0000
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (23 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:39:09 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (85 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:12:52 -0700
   • End of game, yes or no? (40 lines)
     From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:30:12 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (55 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:38:06 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (43 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:31:48 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (55 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:18:59 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (84 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:16:55 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (81 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:02:38 -0700
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (23 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:07:04 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (38 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:25:52 +0000
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (44 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:25:46 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (28 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:31:59 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (21 lines)
     From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:13:48 -0400
   • Re: End of game, yes or no? (104 lines)
     From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:36:58 -0400

6. End of game-now, ball-in-play time
   • Re: End of game-now, ball-in-play time (42 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:55:46 -0400

7. Every soccer game needs to have a time limit
   • Every soccer game needs to have a time limit (41 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:12:27 -0400

8. Interesting appointment given the people involved
   • Interesting appointment given the people involved (21 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:17:56 -0400

9. Law 14 (Was: RE: Law 15)
   • Law 14 (Was: RE: Law 15) (54 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:01:01 +0000
   • Re: Law 14 (Was: RE: Law 15) (98 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:02:34 -0500

10. Law 15
    • Law 15 (27 lines)
      From: Jim Lavigne <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 02:30:07 +0000
    • Re: Law 15 (51 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:24:47 -0700
    • Re: Law 15 (27 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:17:45 -0400
    • Re: Law 15 (38 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:45:58 -0700
    • Re: Law 15 (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:04:05 -0400
    • Re: Law 15 (53 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:16:56 -0700
    • Re: Law 15 (50 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:52:33 +0000
    • Re: Law 15 (67 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:27:29 -0400
    • Re: Law 15 (102 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:57:11 +0000
    • Re: Law 15 (116 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:39:29 -0400
    • Re: Law 15 (66 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:51:56 -0500
    • Re: Law 15 (74 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:26:41 -0700

11. monthly meeting speaker, Mr. Gil Weber
    • monthly meeting speaker, Mr. Gil Weber (35 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:41:02 -0700
    • Re: monthly meeting speaker, Mr. Gil Weber (52 lines)
      From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:39:19 -0700

12. SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS
    • Re: SEPARATE THE INFRINGEMENTS (190 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:51:19 -0400

13. SOCREF-L Digest - 4 Oct 2009 to 5 Oct 2009 (#2009-269)
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 4 Oct 2009 to 5 Oct 2009 (#2009-269) (71 lines)
      From: John Shield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:09:44 -0700
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 4 Oct 2009 to 5 Oct 2009 (#2009-269) (74 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:59:53 -0500

14. Speaking of KA's Philosophy (was Coach's behavior)
    • Speaking of KA's Philosophy (was Coach's behavior) (31 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:11:30 -0700
    • Re: Speaking of KA's Philosophy (was Coach's behavior) (39 lines)
      From: Mark Goorsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:59:34 +0100

15. Sportsmanship
    • Sportsmanship (15 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:18:42 -0400
    • Re: Sportsmanship (22 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:01:27 -0500

16. The profound stupidity of football (the industry, that is) (non-ref related)
    • The profound stupidity of football (the industry, that is) (non-ref related) (42 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:35:28 -0400
    • Re: The profound stupidity of football (the industry, that is) (non-ref related) (61 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 07:47:56 -0500

17. TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ...
    • TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... (19 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:54:27 -0500
    • Re: TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... (32 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:48:49 -0500
    • Re: TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... (41 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:06:11 -0500
    • Re: TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... (53 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:17:07 -0500
    • Re: TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... (65 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:41:19 -0400
    • Re: TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... (29 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:02:56 -0500

18. TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... easier access version
    • Re: TLOTG in a couple of hundred words ... easier access version (51 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:21:45 -0500

19. Unfit or Too Old
    • Re: Unfit or Too Old (37 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:05:25 -0700

20. wtf???
    • wtf??? (19 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:26:32 -0700
    • Re: wtf??? (25 lines)
      From: Jeff Lorentz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:13:08 -0500
    • Re: wtf??? (22 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:16:37 -0700
    • Re: wtf??? (32 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:29:10 +0000
    • Re: wtf??? (16 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:15:27 -0400

21. [UBE?] Re: Ethics Questiion
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: Ethics Questiion (119 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:58:26 -0400
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: Ethics Questiion (34 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:21:00 -0700